Orofacial pain and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in Finnish and Thai populations

Sipilä, Kirsi; Tolvanen, Mimmi; Mitrirattanakul, Somsak; Sitthisomwong, Panupen; Järvelin, Marjo‐Riitta; Taanila, Anja; Anttonen, Vuokko; Lahti, Satu

doi:10.3109/00016357.2014.949842

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 30 publications

(32 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, based on previous results, the duration of the reference period (1 month vs 12 months) does not seem to have a statistically nor clinically significant effect on reported oral impacts [42]. A re-analysis of the same data on four singleitem questions was conducted, showing the agreement to be substantial for three items: facial pain, jaw pain and OHIP-14 pain item [43]. The re-analysis showed moderate agreement for the fourth item, dental pain, which is commonly acute compared to facial pain, which is more often chronic.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Do changes in oral health-related quality-of-life, facial pain and temporomandibular disorders correlate after treatment of severe malocclusion?

Silvola

Tolvanen

Rusanen

et al. 2015

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The aim was to evaluate the relationships of changes in facial pain, temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and oral health-related quality-of-life (OHRQoL) in adults who underwent orthodontic or orthodontic/surgical treatment. Methods. Sixty-four patients (46 women, 18 men, range 18-64 years) with severe malocclusion and functional problems were treated in Oulu University Hospital. Of these, 44 underwent orthodontic-surgical and 20 orthodontic treatment. Data were collected with questionnaires and clinical stomatognathic examinations before and on average 3 years after treatment. The OHRQoL was measured with OHIP-14 (The Oral Health Impact Profile), the intensity of facial pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the severity of TMD with the Helkimo's anamnestic (Ai) and clinical (Di) dysfunction indices. Results. A significant improvement was found in facial pain, signs and symptoms of TMD and OHRQoL after the treatment (p < 0.05). The decrease in VAS was associated with improvement in OHIP-14 severity (r = 0.296, p = 0.019). The correlations between changes in OHIP-14 severity and Ai and Di were not statistically significant. Conclusion. Treatment of severe malocclusion seemed to improve OHRQoL via decreased facial pain. Decreased facial pain was associated especially with improved OHRQoL dimensions of physical pain, physical disability and social disability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Do changes in oral health-related quality-of-life, facial pain and temporomandibular disorders correlate after treatment of severe malocclusion?

Silvola

Tolvanen

Rusanen

et al. 2015

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 34 – 36 There are also cross-cultural differences in pain reporting; for example, Thai participants are more likely to report orofacial pain symptoms than Finnish participants. 37 Another study comparing the prevalence of TMD pain in Chinese and Swedish people found that the former reported higher prevalence. 38 Sensitivity to pain, as determined by quantitative sensory testing, is lower in White individuals than in non-Whites, corroborating the cross-cultural differences in orofacial pain prevalence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of self-reported pain-related temporomandibular disorders and association with psychological distress in a dental clinic setting

Chuinsiri

Jitprasertwong

2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To investigate the prevalence of self-reported pain-related temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and its association with psychological status in a dental clinic setting. Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients were asked to complete a TMD pain screener and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Correlations between symptoms of pain-related TMDs and PHQ-4 scores were analysed using Spearman’s correlation test. Symptoms of pain-related TMDs were compared between four groups of participants with different psychological profiles using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by multiple comparisons. The level of significance was adjusted using the Dunn–Bonferroni test. Results The prevalence of self-reported pain-related TMDs was 22.2%. TMD pain score was positively correlated with PHQ-4 score. The high anxiety and the comorbidity groups had significantly higher TMD pain scores than the controls. Conclusion There was a high prevalence of self-reported pain-related TMDs, which was correlated with scores on all psychological assessment scales. Symptoms of pain-related TMDs were significantly greater in patients with high anxiety scores, regardless of depression level.

show abstract

“…TMD is considered the major cause of non-dental pain in the orofacial region, and it negatively affects the quality of life (QoL). ( 12 - 14 ) Comprehensive measurements of TMD and its impact in life are commonly captured using QoL questionnaires.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is quality of life affected by temporomandibular disorders?

Trize¹,

Calabria²,

Franzolin³

et al. 2018

Einstein (São Paulo)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To determine the impact of temporomandibular disorders in quality of life.Methods A total of 102 volunteer patients (68 female) aged 19 to 86 years, who sought medical care in health clinics of the university and were evaluated in the period from September to December 2013. The subjects were examined according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, using a mechanical algometer (Palpeter®) with standardized pressure of 0.5 and 1.0kg, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire, to assess quality of life. The data were tabulated for statistical analysis and the variables were correlated with the clinical findings of the temporomandibular disorders and quality of life.Results Fifty percent of patients were positive for temporomandibular disorders and 39.2% classified as myofascial pain group. The temporomandibular disorder group was significantly associated with uncomfortable bite (p=0.0000), temporomandibular joint clicking (p=0.0001) and tooth clenching (p=0.0001). The Mann Whitney test used to analyze the SF-36 revealed that the domains of pain (mean score of 47.80%; p<0.0001) and mental health (62.67%; p<0.05) were strongly associated with temporomandibular disorders.Conclusion The quality of life of individuals with temporomandibular disorders was negatively affected by the presence of pain and mental health disorders.

show abstract

Orofacial pain and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in Finnish and Thai populations

Cited by 7 publications

References 30 publications

Do changes in oral health-related quality-of-life, facial pain and temporomandibular disorders correlate after treatment of severe malocclusion?

Do changes in oral health-related quality-of-life, facial pain and temporomandibular disorders correlate after treatment of severe malocclusion?

Prevalence of self-reported pain-related temporomandibular disorders and association with psychological distress in a dental clinic setting

Is quality of life affected by temporomandibular disorders?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About