Orofacial Function, Articulation Proficiency, and Intelligibility in 5-Year-Old Children Born With Cleft Lip and Palate

Malmenholt, Ann; McAllister, Anita; Lohmander, Anette

doi:10.1177/1055665618783154

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 134 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the study of Malmenholt et al [25], a somewhat lower proportion of the total group (11.5 %) had BCLP and a somewhat higher proportion (23.1 %) had CP/L+, compared with the present study, where 16.2 % of the children with PCC scores had BCLP and about 19.2 % had CP/L+. Of the children with CP/L + in the study by Malmenholt et al [25], 42 % had age-appropriate articulation proficiency, compared to 57.9 % in the present study.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

“…In their study, 39 % (n = 19) of the whole group (n = 52) had age-appropriate articulation proficiency, defined as a PCC score above − 1 SD, compared to 58.6 % (n = 58) in the present study. Thus, a higher proportion of children in the present study had age-appropriate articulatory proficiency than in the study by Malmenholt et al [25]. In the study of Malmenholt et al [25], a somewhat lower proportion of the total group (11.5 %) had BCLP and a somewhat higher proportion (23.1 %) had CP/L+, compared with the present study, where 16.2 % of the children with PCC scores had BCLP and about 19.2 % had CP/L+.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 63%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

“…The results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies [4,25]. Malmenholt et al [25] examined PCC according to the same methods used in the present study, in 5-year-olds with CP/L + and CP/L-, aiming for a consecutive series of children. In their study, 39 % (n = 19) of the whole group (n = 52) had age-appropriate articulation proficiency, defined as a PCC score above − 1 SD, compared to 58.6 % (n = 58) in the present study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. The aim of this study was to present speech outcome of a consecutive series of 5-year-olds born with CP/L, and to compare speech results of children with CP/L + and children with CP/L without known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L-). Methods One hundred 5-year-olds (20 with CP/L+; 80 with CP/L-) participated. All children were treated with primary palatal surgery in one stage with the same procedure for muscle reconstruction. Three independent judges performed phonetic transcriptions and rated perceived velopharyngeal competence from audio recordings. Based on phonetic transcriptions, percent consonants correct (PCC) and percent non-oral errors were investigated. Group comparisons were performed. Results In the total group, mean PCC was 88.2 and mean percent non-oral errors 1.5. The group with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) had poorer results on both measures compared to groups with other cleft types. The average results of PCC and percent non-oral errors in the CP/L + group indicated somewhat poorer speech, but no significant differences were observed. In the CP/L + group, 25 % were judged as having incompetent velopharyngeal competence, compared to 15 % in the CP/L- group. Conclusions The results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies. Speech was poorer in many children with more extensive clefts. No significant differences in speech outcomes were observed between CP/L + and CP/L- groups.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 63%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1,3 NOT-S ile şimdiye dek adenotonsiller hipertrofi, ektodermal displazi, Prader-Willi sendromu, Treacher Collins sendromu, serebral palsi, dudak ve damak yarığı, amyotrofik lateral skleroz, multipl skleroz, astım, temporomandibular bozukluk, oromandibular distoni ve Parkinson hastalığıyla ilişkili araştırmalar yapılmıştır. 5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Aynı zamanda Nordik dillerinde, Brezilya Portekizcesi, Fransızca dilinde geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği sağlanmıştır. 1,3,22 İngilizce ve farklı dillerdeki çevirisine ücretsiz olarak http://www.mun-h-center.se/en/information-material/not-s/ adresinden ulaşılabilmektedir.…”

unclassified

Evaluation of Orofacial Dysfunctions in Healthy Children with the Turkish Version of the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening

İNCİOĞLU¹,

ALAÇAM²

2022

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orofasiyal disfonksiyonlara bağlı bozuklukların doğru tanımlanması, multidisipliner tedavilerin daha sağlıklı yürütülmesi açısından önemlidir. Bu amaçla kullanılan Nordik Orofasiyal Tarama Testi (NOT-S), kapsamlı ön görüşme ve klinik muayeneden oluşan bir tarama yöntemidir. Bu çalışmada, NOT-S Türkçe uyarlamasının geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin belirlenmesiyle sağlıklı çocuklarda orofasiyal disfonksiyon profilinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: NOT-S İngilizce uyarlamasının, Türkçeye kültürel uyumlanması standart protokol uygulanarak yapıldı. NOT-S güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi için rastgele seçilen 35 çocuğa test-tekrar test uygulaması gerçekleştirildi. Türkçeye uyarlanan NOT-S protokolü, 8-14 yaşları arasındaki 504 katılımcıya uygulandı. Tüm katılımcıların cinsiyet, yaş grupları, dişlenme dönemi ile normal oklüzyon ve maloklüzyon durumları, NOT-S anamnez, klinik muayene ve toplam puanlarıyla kıyaslanarak diskriminant geçerlilik belirlendi. Katılımcılar arasında NOT-S puanları açısından farkın önemliliği Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testleri ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: NOT-S uygulamasına ilişkin test-tekrar test güvenilirlik sonuçlarının, önemli düzeyde güvenilirliğe sahip olduğu görüldü (p<0,001). Geçerlilik değerlendirmesinde katılımcılarda yaş, cinsiyet ve dişlenme dönemi açısından NOT-S anamnez, NOT-S klinik muayene ve NOT-S toplam puanlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p>0,001). Ancak maloklüzyon varlığında NOT-S puanlarının, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha yüksek olduğu görüldü (p<0,001). Sonuç: NOT-S'nin Türkçe uyarlamasının geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği kabul edildi. NOT-S ile yapılan değerlendirmede, sağlıklı çocuklarda maloklüzyonların belirgin şekilde orofasiyal disfonksiyonlarla bağlantılı olduğu saptandı.Anah tar Ke li me ler: Fasiyal kaslar; maloklüzyon; alışkanlıklar ABS TRACT Objective: Accurate identification of disorders related to orofacial dysfunctions is important for a healthier management of multidisciplinary treatments. The Nordic Orofacial Screening Test (NOT-S), used for this purpose, is a screening method consisting of a comprehensive preliminary interview and clinical examination. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of NOT-S; as well as to determine the orofacial dysfunction profile of healthy children. Material and Methods: Via Standard protocol, the English version of NOT-S had been culturally adapted to the Turkish language. To assess the reliability, a test re-test was performed on randomly selected 35 participants. Turkish version of NOT-S was applied in 504 children, age 8-14. The discriminant validity was assessed by comparing NOT-S scores between genders, dentition groups and normal occlusion with different malocclusions groups. The significance of the difference between the participants in terms of NOT-S scores was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The reliability results of test re-test of Turkish version of NOT-S were found statistical...

show abstract

Speech pathology telepractice intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic for Spanish-speaking children with cleft palate: A systematic review

Palomares-Aguilera

Inostroza-Allende

Solar³

2021

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orofacial Function, Articulation Proficiency, and Intelligibility in 5-Year-Old Children Born With Cleft Lip and Palate

Abstract: Orofacial dysfunction was not found to be an explanatory factor for speech outcome in children born with CLP.

Cited by 8 publications

References 134 publications

Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

Evaluation of Orofacial Dysfunctions in Healthy Children with the Turkish Version of the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening

Speech pathology telepractice intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic for Spanish-speaking children with cleft palate: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About