2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1952-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orofacial evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis using Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening

Abstract: This study points out the orofacial dysfunctions which health professionals should be aware in this population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The median was 2 in the interview domain of the NOT‐S, 1 in the clinical examination domain, and thus 3 in total. This finding is consistent with the previous findings reported in a study which was conducted on a sample of the healthy controls ( n = 34) and patients with multiple sclerosis ( n = 34) (Gonçalves et al, 2017). These values could be considered normal suggesting that the orofacial functions of the participants may be minimally affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The median was 2 in the interview domain of the NOT‐S, 1 in the clinical examination domain, and thus 3 in total. This finding is consistent with the previous findings reported in a study which was conducted on a sample of the healthy controls ( n = 34) and patients with multiple sclerosis ( n = 34) (Gonçalves et al, 2017). These values could be considered normal suggesting that the orofacial functions of the participants may be minimally affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite there being several studies on the oral condition of MS patients [8][9][10], there is a gap in the literature about the prevalence and management of halitosis and whether there is a relation to the type of medication used for MS or the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (degree of neurological disability, which is measured on a scale of 0 to 10, 0.5 by 0.5, and in which the higher the number, the higher the inability is).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as one can assume this classification can loosely encompass all the different manifestations of dysphagia. (18)(19)(20)(21)(22) Hence, neurologic dysphagia is diagnosed in a patient when the underlying error that leads to dysphagia is within the neural circuits that orchestrate dysphagia rather than related anatomical structures and functional dysphagia is detected in the absence of any anatomical and neuronal abnormalities that might contribute to difficulty swallowing. (23,24) Another aspect of dysphagia is whether or not the patient experiences different levels of difficulty when swallowing different forms of foods such as liquid or solid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%