2013
DOI: 10.1002/tect.20087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orocline and syntaxes formation during subduction and collision

Abstract: [1] The present work investigates the formation of curved ranges and syntaxes with scaled laboratory experiments. We simulated subduction and collision processes comparable to India-Asia configuration involving a continental upper plate and a subducting plate composed of an oceanic lithosphere and a continental indenter. The experiments reveal that the shape of the mountain range (concave, straight, or convex) and the development of syntaxes are controlled by the subduction interface, the buoyancy number (F b … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the interest of simplicity in the models and because the shape of Greater India is still highly debated [see review Ali and Aitchison , ], the Indian continent is approximated as a square shape extending 2100 km × 2100 km laterally (Figure b, map view). We note that a similar geometry of the model setup was also explored in analogue models [ Bajolet et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interest of simplicity in the models and because the shape of Greater India is still highly debated [see review Ali and Aitchison , ], the Indian continent is approximated as a square shape extending 2100 km × 2100 km laterally (Figure b, map view). We note that a similar geometry of the model setup was also explored in analogue models [ Bajolet et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the order 2 × 10 2 (Schellart, 2004a,b;Meyer and Schellart, 2013;Chen et al, 2015b), 6 × 10 2 (Mériaux et al, 2015a,b) and 3.5−10 × 10 2 , to intermediate values, i.e. of the order 1.5 × 10 3 (Bajolet et al, 2013), 6 × 10 3 (Guillaume et al, 2009), 1.2 × 10 4 (Heuret et al, 2007) and 1.5 × 10 4 (Martinod et al, 2013), to relatively high values, i.e. of the order 10 4 -10 5 (Funiciello et al, 2006) and 10 6 -10 7 (e.g.…”
Section: Scaling Of Subduction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most commonly used materials include hydrocarbon compositional systems, which are mixtures of solid hydrocarbons, powders and mineral oils (Shemenda, 1992(Shemenda, , 1993Chemenda et al, 1995Chemenda et al, , 2000Boutelier et al, 2003;Boutelier and Cruden, 2013), plasticine (Tapponnier et al,1982), wax (Brune and Ellis, 1997), petrolatum or petroleum jelly (e.g. Heuret et al, 2007;Bajolet et al, 2013) and paraffin oil-petrolatum mixtures (Duarte et al, 2013(Duarte et al, , 2014Edwards et al, 2015). The latter two materials have in particular been used to coat the subduction zone interface in subduction experiments.…”
Section: Materials With Linear Viscous Non-linear Viscous Visco-plamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plate boundary stays almost straight unlike the arcuate Himalaya bounded by syntaxes. This implies that processes not reproduced in the experiments and controlled by earlier oceanic subduction stages and/or the shape of Greater India [ Ali and Aitchison , ; Replumaz et al ., ; van Hinsbergen et al ., ; Bajolet et al ., ] would be responsible for specific features of the orogen such as (i) the Himalayan orocline and the variable strike of rifts potentially due to oroclinal bending [ Ratschbacher et al ., ], (ii) the lateral variations in strain orientation along the orogenic front [ Seeber and Pecher , ; Kapp and Guynn , ], and (iii) southward propagation of the orogenic front [ Murphy and Copeland , ; Bajolet et al ., ]. In our models, the grabens are also restricted to the plate boundary area and within the cratonic lithosphere, and transpression is confined to the inner plateau (Figures ), whereas central Tibet is under transtension [ Andronicos et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%