1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(98)00197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oroclinal bending in the Caledonides of western Ireland: a mid-Palaeozoic feature controlled by a pre-existing structural grain

Abstract: The Caledonides of the west of Ireland mark a segment of the Caledonian-Appalachian orogen where the structural grain swings from the NE-SW trend that typifies the Caledonides of northern Britain to an E-W orientation. The origin of this arcuate structure has previously been proposed to be either primary, reflecting the original geometry of promontories and embayments in the Laurentian margin in this sector of the orogen, or secondary, as evidenced by palaeomagnetically determined clockwise rotations in Siluri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested, therefore, that the offsets in the measured declinations across the Iapetus Suture are the result of local tectonic rotations, about vertical axes, as a result of Caledonian and/or Variscan deformation in southern Britain. Such local‐scale rotations have previously been documented, as a result of post‐Silurian deformation, on the Laurentian margin of the Iapetus (Mac Niocaill et al 1998).…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is suggested, therefore, that the offsets in the measured declinations across the Iapetus Suture are the result of local tectonic rotations, about vertical axes, as a result of Caledonian and/or Variscan deformation in southern Britain. Such local‐scale rotations have previously been documented, as a result of post‐Silurian deformation, on the Laurentian margin of the Iapetus (Mac Niocaill et al 1998).…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Average standard deviation of remanence inclination is σ R = 8.4° (pre‐folding data sets only). Data from Gough & Opdike (1963), Klootwijk & Bingham (1980), Lin Jinlu & Watts (1988), Otofuji et al (1989), Sharps et al (1989), McFadden (1990), Channell et al (1992a,b), Chen et al (1992), Hirt et al (1992), Huang et al (1992), Klootwijk et al (1994), Thomas et al (1994), Cogné et al (1995), Haihong et al (1995), Patzelt et al (1996), Mac Niocaill et al (1998), Haubold et al (1999), Liu & Morinaga (1999), Thomas et al (1999), Uno (1999), Arriagada et al (2000), Huang et al (2000), Mac Niocaill (2000), Pueyo (2000), Henry et al (2001), Jordanova et al (2001), Waldhör et al (2001), Enkin et al (2000, 2002), Kravchinsky et al (2002), Schätz et al (2002), Zwing et al (2002), Enkin (2003), Halim et al (2003), Levashova et al (2003), Lewchuk et al (2003), Molina‐Garza et al (2003), Niitsuma et al (2003), Henry et al (2004), Pueyo et al (2004), Staiger (2004), Tamai et al (2004), Uno et al (2004), Huang et al (2005).…”
Section: Intersections Numbers and Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryan et al (1995) have shown that this fault is a continuation of the Antrim-Galway and Southern Upland fault lines and was active at the initiation of intrusion of the main Galway Granite but that movement on it had ceased before the emplacement of the batholith ended, as is confirmed below. Neither they nor MacNiocaill et al (1998), who also appreciated its importance in controlling the emplacement of the granite, detailed how the Skird Rocks Fault generated the space for the granite. Unlike the Donegal Granite, in which the required space was demonstratably obtained in the gap between the exposed bifurcation and re-joining of a major sinistral fault, (Hutton 1982), no major faulting has been found along one side, the north side, of the Galway Granite.…”
Section: Emplacement Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%