2002
DOI: 10.1086/339704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origins of Solar System Dust beyond Jupiter

Abstract: The measurements of cosmic interplanetary dust by the instruments on board the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft contain the dynamical signature of dust generated by Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt objects, as well as short period Oort Cloud comets and short period Jupiter family comets. While the dust concentration detected between Jupiter and Saturn is mainly due to the cometary components, the dust outside Saturn's orbit is dominated by grains originating from the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt. In order to sustain a dust concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
100
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A steady-state population of several tens to a hundred of such comets would, in the long term, feed interplanetary space with sufficient dust for our findings. Additionally, modeling of direct dust detections beyond Jupiter requires a contribution from HTCs of about the same order of magnitude (e.g., Landgraf et al 2002). These independent studies support our results and validate our approach.…”
Section: Total Mass Of the Particle Populationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A steady-state population of several tens to a hundred of such comets would, in the long term, feed interplanetary space with sufficient dust for our findings. Additionally, modeling of direct dust detections beyond Jupiter requires a contribution from HTCs of about the same order of magnitude (e.g., Landgraf et al 2002). These independent studies support our results and validate our approach.…”
Section: Total Mass Of the Particle Populationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The similar H 2 O fluxes per unit area into the four giant planets and Titan (Feuchtgruber et al 1997;Coustenis et al 1998;Moses et al 2000), combined with the rather constant dust flux (∼3×10 −18 g cm −2 s −1 ) measured in interplanetary space beyond 5 AU (Landgraf et al 2002) have been regarded as evidence that micrometeoroids -interplanetary (IDPs) or interstellar -are the dominant source (Moses et al 2000). Along with the evidence that the H 2 O present in Jupiter's atmosphere results from the Shoemaker-Levy 9 1994 impact -and that CO in Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune Cavalié et al 2010;Lellouch et al 2005) also result from ancient cometary impacts -our inference that Enceladus is a quantitatively viable source of Saturn's water clearly shifts the paradigm towards local or sporadic sources playing a more important role.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For The Source Of Water In Saturmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The scarcity of primordial noble gases in Titan's atmosphere (Niemann et al 2010) tends to rule out cometary impacts as suppliers of volatiles there. Furthermore, based on the Landgraf et al (2002) dust fluxes and accounting for the gravitational focusing by Saturn at Titan's distance, we have found that the micro-meteoritic flux into Titan is in the range (0.1−0.7) × 10 6 mol cm −2 s −1 , depending on micrometeoroid velocity (i.e. their origin and orbit -interstellar, Halley-type or Kuiper Belt-like -see Moses et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For The Source Of Water In Saturmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ringlike structures seen in a number of resolved Spitzer disks, e.g., Fomalhaut (Stapelfeldt et al 2004) and Eri ( D. E. Backman et al 2006, in preparation), as well as in HST images ( Kalas et al 2005( Kalas et al , 2006, suggest that although the regions interior to the rings may not be completely empty due to a variety of mechanisms capable of transporting material inward from the outer disk (comets, Poynting-Robertson drag, interactions with planets, etc. ; Holmes et al 2002), these interior regions may have a quite low total optical depth, perhaps as low as the $20% contribution inferred for material from Kuiper Belt material to the total amount seen at 1 AU in our solar system (Landgraf et al 2002;Dermott & Kehoe 2004;Moro-Martín & Malhotra 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Exozodiacal Dust On Planet Findingmentioning
confidence: 71%