“…He wrote that "free-competition realizes justice in wealth distribution, as well as the maximal possible welfare accessible through trade and production" (Rist, 1904, p. 645). In Rist's eyes, upholding marginalism and defending the proprietors were two very different things and he followed the tendencies of older French liberal economists (Bastiat, Leroy-Beaulieu, and others) while endorsing the views of Menger, who criticized those that he dubbed "mere advocates" (Campagnolo, 2009). In a free competition society, the prices that clear the market provide each and every one the maximum amount of satisfaction that can be obtained in the given circumstances: this is the "subjective utility" and Rist uses the term "ophelimity" once put forth in French by the marginalists to discard "utility," which was most often understood only in terms of its objective meaning.…”