Origin, Persistence, and Resolution of the Rotational Grazing Debate: Integrating Human Dimensions Into Rangeland Research

Abstract

The debate regarding the benefits of rotational grazing has eluded resolution within the US rangeland profession for more than 60 yr. This forum examines the origin of the debate and the major reasons for its persistence in an attempt to identify common ground for resolution, and to search for meaningful lessons from this central chapter in the history of the US rangeland profession. Rotational grazing was a component of the institutional and scientific response to severe rangeland degradation at the turn of the 20th century, and it has since become the professional norm for grazing management. Managers have found that rotational grazing systems can work for diverse management purposes, but scientific experiments have demonstrated that they do not necessarily work for specific ecological purposes. These interpretations appear contradictory, but we contend that they can be reconciled by evaluation within the context of complex adaptive systems in which human variables such as goal setting, experiential knowledge, and decision making are given equal importance to biophysical variables. The scientific evidence refuting the ecological benefits of rotational grazing is robust, but also narrowly focused, because it derives from experiments that intentionally excluded these human variables. Consequently, the profession has attempted to answer a broad, complex question-whether or not managers should adopt rotational grazing-with necessarily narrow experimental research focused exclusively on ecological processes. The rotational grazing debate persists because the rangeland profession has not yet developed a management and research framework capable of incorporating both the social and biophysical components of complex adaptive systems. We recommend moving beyond the debate over whether or not rotational grazing works by focusing on adaptive management and the integration of experiential and experimental, as well as social and biophysical, knowledge to provide a more comprehensive framework for the management of rangeland systems. This manuscript originated from a symposium organized by D. D. Briske and J. D. Derner entitled, ''Development of comprehensive grazing policy guidelines: a case for adaptive collaboration within the rangeland profession,'' held at the 62nd annual meeting of the Society for Range Management,

Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil

“…On the other hand, increased production may raise the importance of formal markets and strengthen vertical chains, making it more difficult for small producers to contribute to the supply chain . Understanding winners and losers and the social aspects of adoption of more intensive systems is thus critical (Briske et al, 2011).…”

The effects of pasture inputs and intensive rotational grazing on superfine wool production, quality and income

“…Cell grazing proponents have claimed that this system of grazing leads to increased pasture utilisation, greater species diversity, enhanced soil P, improved animal performance and higher profitability (McCosker 2000), although there is much conjecture about these claims in the literature (Norton 1998;Saul and Chapman 2002;Briske et al 2011).…”

Delivering extension and adult learning outcomes from the Cicerone Project by ‘comparing, measuring, learning and adopting'

“…As noted by Briske et al (2011), resolving differences of opinion regarding complex issues such as grazing management, might be assisted if, in addition to understanding the scientific properties of grazed pastures and livestock, more effort was made to understand the human dimension of management decision-making, which governs rangeland management. Some of the other issues raised by Briske et al (2011) include questions of the mental models graziers use, the seeking of cause and effect relationships and the value of the added investments in fences and watering points involved in intensive rotational grazing systems.…”

“…Some of the other issues raised by Briske et al (2011) include questions of the mental models graziers use, the seeking of cause and effect relationships and the value of the added investments in fences and watering points involved in intensive rotational grazing systems.…”

“…Many of these, including livestock producer members, are coauthors of one or more papers, including this paper. Thus, this producer-led partnership has been able to develop shared goals, methods of answering questions and interpreting results necessary for successful participatory partnerships (Briske et al 2011).…”