2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the superior activity of surface doped SmMn2O5 mullites for NO oxidation: A first-principles based microkinetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, such narrowly distributed surface O p-band centers are not capable of describing the trend in the chemisorption energies, as shown in Figure 2(c) and 2(f). catalytic activity in redox catalysis 42 , is correlated to the chemisorption energies. The…”
Section: Dft Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, such narrowly distributed surface O p-band centers are not capable of describing the trend in the chemisorption energies, as shown in Figure 2(c) and 2(f). catalytic activity in redox catalysis 42 , is correlated to the chemisorption energies. The…”
Section: Dft Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 74 ] On the mullite oxide surface, different mechanisms have been proposed. [ 38,71,75 ] The initial understanding was that NO oxidation reaction occurs via the Eley–Rideal (ER, Figure 5b) mechanism, under which oxygen molecules are dissociatively adsorbed on neighboring Mn 4+ –Mn 4+ dimers. Based on first‐principles calculations, Wang et al proposed that the adjacent Mn 4+ –Mn 4+ sites in octahedral units energetically prefer to adsorb O 2 compared with NO.…”
Section: Origin Of Catalytic Activity and Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of the NO 2 gas molecule creates an oxygen vacancy site, which is replenished by the gas‐phase O 2 , regenerating the surface for the next cycle. [ 75 ]…”
Section: Origin Of Catalytic Activity and Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in good agreement with surface studies for each material. [15][16][17] Although the NO adsorption-desorption process for CeO2 was only observed on the (100) surface, both the (111) and (110) surfaces were also considered since they are known stable surfaces. However, these surfaces proved to have a weak affinity for NO binding.…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%