2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the retention loss in ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2-based memory devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 Depolarization fields caused a degradation of the retained state for oxygenpoor films, as detected in the relaxed polarization measured at room temperature after one second relaxation time, which for samples deposited with 0.1 s ozone dose time showed a reduction of 16%. Similar findings were reported by Chouprik et al 100 who studied the mechanism of retention loss and imprint. They calculated an activation energy of 0.54 eV for the both negative and positive imprint through sample aging at different temperatures.…”
Section: Fecap Performance and Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…47 Depolarization fields caused a degradation of the retained state for oxygenpoor films, as detected in the relaxed polarization measured at room temperature after one second relaxation time, which for samples deposited with 0.1 s ozone dose time showed a reduction of 16%. Similar findings were reported by Chouprik et al 100 who studied the mechanism of retention loss and imprint. They calculated an activation energy of 0.54 eV for the both negative and positive imprint through sample aging at different temperatures.…”
Section: Fecap Performance and Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Chouprik et al reported the retention loss and imprint effect in ferroelectric Hf 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 thin films, which caused by built‐in electric fields emerging during the ferroelectric aging process. [ 126 ] The built‐in field might be attributed to long‐term charge diffusion process and short‐term trapping/detrapping effect.…”
Section: Imprint and Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller polarization changes were observed at 500 °C during the data retention test at 85 °C for 1000 min than 450 °C. The retention result at 500 °C can be projected to result in a slight degradation, even after 10 years applying a fitting model of power-law for the result above 10 min, considering charge trapping and the migration [13,14]. These results indicate that MFM with RTA at 500 °C or above enables significant polarization and high reliability.…”
Section: A Dependence Of Ferroelectric Performance On Annealing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 84%