2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja026403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the Extended Mars Radar Blackout of September 2017

Abstract: The Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding (MARSIS) onboard Mars Express, which operates between 0.1 and 5.5 MHz, suffered from a complete blackout for 10 days in September 2017 when observing on the nightside (a rare occurrence). Moreover, the Shallow Radar (SHARAD) onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which operates at 20 MHz, also suffered a blackout for three days when operating on both dayside and nightside. We propose that these blackouts are caused by solar energetic particles of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the right half of Figure 3, where MEX descends at lower than 1,200 km altitudes, and for sounding frequencies greater than 2.5 MHz, MARSIS should detect the reflected signal from the surface when there is no absorption in the lower atmosphere caused by a layer of energetic particles. Data from the Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) instrument (Larson et al., 2015) on board MAVEN (not shown here) indicate an increase in the flux of energetic electrons during MEX orbit 16148, which explains the attenuation of the MARSIS signal resulting in the lack of a surface signature (Espley et al., 2007; Němec et al., 2014; Sánchez‐Cano et al., 2019). The absence of the surface echo in orbit 16130 though is rather baffling since the flux of energetic charged particles detected was insignificant at this time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the right half of Figure 3, where MEX descends at lower than 1,200 km altitudes, and for sounding frequencies greater than 2.5 MHz, MARSIS should detect the reflected signal from the surface when there is no absorption in the lower atmosphere caused by a layer of energetic particles. Data from the Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) instrument (Larson et al., 2015) on board MAVEN (not shown here) indicate an increase in the flux of energetic electrons during MEX orbit 16148, which explains the attenuation of the MARSIS signal resulting in the lack of a surface signature (Espley et al., 2007; Němec et al., 2014; Sánchez‐Cano et al., 2019). The absence of the surface echo in orbit 16130 though is rather baffling since the flux of energetic charged particles detected was insignificant at this time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Surface echoes are largely affected by low‐altitude ionization. Enhanced plasma densities at collisional altitudes cause efficient absorption of the MARSIS signal and consequently, weaker surface reflections or no reflections at all are observed (Espley et al., 2007; Němec et al., 2014; Sánchez‐Cano et al., 2019). Local physical properties of the surface may also play a role in determining how efficiently the MARSIS signal is reflected.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the time of the baseline orbits, the Martian upper atmosphere was not contaminated by other significant sources of density and compositional change such as significant dust storms (not present), CMEs (arrived later), or SEPs (primarily affect altitudes lower than those observed by NGIMS) (C. O. Lee, Jakosky, et al., 2018; Mayyasi et al., 2018; Sánchez‐Cano et al., 2019). Other flares of magnitude M and greater from same solar event were also not present at the time of or directly preceding the five baseline orbits (Chamberlin et al., 2018).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Martian nightside ionosphere near the terminator is maintained thanks to dayto-night plasma transport (e.g., Chen et al 1978;Cui et al 2015) together with impact ionisation by precipitating electrons (e.g., Cao et al 2019), where densities of the major ions decrease with the solar zenith angle (SZA) across the terminator (e.g., Girazian et al 2017;Withers et al 2012). Far from the terminator, electron precipitation is the dominant source of ionisation, which is more important over regions of strong crustal magnetic fields (as will be described in the Section "Planetary environments") (e.g., Nĕmec et al 2010;Lillis et al 2018), and during solar storms (e.g., Sánchez-Cano et al 2019). Transport also plays a large role maintaining the nighttime ionosphere at Earth, with current systems leading to E×B drifts and neutral winds driving field-aligned motions that may both lift and move plasma to less dense regions where ion loss through photochemical recombination occurs more slowly (e.g., Heelis 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%