2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the constricted hysteresis loop in cobalt ferrites revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further evidence for a more magnetically anisotropic system is displayed in the higher remanence ratios ( M R / M S ) of the cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (Table ). Alternatively, this can also be ascribed to competition between different spin ordering structures, such as spin canting effects and/or a random distribution of cations between the (A) and [B] subsites, as aging experiments on CoFe 2 O 4 have shown …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further evidence for a more magnetically anisotropic system is displayed in the higher remanence ratios ( M R / M S ) of the cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (Table ). Alternatively, this can also be ascribed to competition between different spin ordering structures, such as spin canting effects and/or a random distribution of cations between the (A) and [B] subsites, as aging experiments on CoFe 2 O 4 have shown …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the coexistence of doublets and sextets in the observed Mössbauer spectra extends over a large temperature range, the blocking temperature is determined where the area of the doublets and sextets are equal; this designates the average blocking temperature for the ensemble of the nanoparticles in the sample. Information about the average blocking temperature and average nanoparticle size has been used in eq to obtain K = 2.5 × 10 4 J/m 3 and τ 0 = 0.5 × 10 –9 s. Bulk CoFe 2 O 4 , as with all spinels, possesses cubic magnetic anisotropy, with its first coefficient of magnetocrystalline anisotropy, K 1 , in the range of (1.8–3.0) × 10 5 J/m 3 , while τ 0 is of the order of a time scale of 10 –9 s, usually assumed for superparamagnetic nanoparticles. We note that the value of K obtained is an order of magnitude smaller than that of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the bulk, in contradiction to prior reports of increased anisotropy of up to 2 orders of magnitude for nanoparticles, due to shape, surface, and strain anisotropy contributions. , Moreover, the K value is consistent with use in the PDF studies presented in Section .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Preliminary data also reveals another discontinuity at 65 kOe suggestive of a spin‐flop transition at higher field. The M ZFC ( T ) follows a similar curvature to the other corresponding quadrants of the hysteresis curve, and this unusual curvature is due to a constriction of the hysteresis loop, rather than a spin‐flop like transition [20, 21, 23, 24] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%