2013
DOI: 10.1021/jp310470f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the Conformational Modulation of the 13C NMR Chemical Shift of Methoxy Groups in Aromatic Natural Compounds

Abstract: The interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) parameters is essential to understanding experimental observations at the molecular and supramolecular levels and to designing new and more efficient molecular probes. In many aromatic natural compounds, unusual (13)C NMR chemical shifts have been reported for out-of-plane methoxy groups bonded to the aromatic ring (~62 ppm as compared to the typical value of ~56 ppm for an aromatic methoxy group). Here, we analyzed this phenomenon for a series of aromatic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation of σ para is more complex than σ dia because the paramagnetic mechanism involves magnetic coupling of occupied and unoccupied orbitals. As several articles deeply describe the theory of σ para , we omitted a detailed description in the present work. However, it is important to mention that the magnitude of σ para (sign is usually negative) depends on the strength of the magnetic coupling and the energy gap between coupled orbitals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interpretation of σ para is more complex than σ dia because the paramagnetic mechanism involves magnetic coupling of occupied and unoccupied orbitals. As several articles deeply describe the theory of σ para , we omitted a detailed description in the present work. However, it is important to mention that the magnitude of σ para (sign is usually negative) depends on the strength of the magnetic coupling and the energy gap between coupled orbitals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For a complete understanding about the description of shielding tensor and the “orbital rotation model,” applied in this work to explain the paramagnetic shielding, we suggest to the reader some references …”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 in Supporting Information) show the out‐of‐plane orientation of the methoxy groups in position 7 characterized by somewhat deshielded 13 C NMR resonance of the methyl carbon (δ ~ 61 ppm, see Table ). This deshielding for out‐of‐plane conformation was reported several times and has been rationalized very recently by the paramagnetic deshielding effect of BD C‐H → BD* C‐O transition . The NMR chemical shift of C8 was found in the range typical for the methoxy groups bonded to the aromatic system (δ ~ 56 ppm, see Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This deshielding for out-of-plane conformation was reported several times [25][26][27][28] and has been rationalized very recently by the paramagnetic deshielding effect of BD C-H → BD* (2) transition. [29] The NMR chemical shift of C8 was found in the range typical for the methoxy groups bonded to the aromatic system (δ~56 ppm, see Table 2). …”
Section: Results and Discussion Preparation And Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[78][79] An orbital analysis, closely related to the original Natural Chemical Shift (NCS) analysis, [80][81][82] of the computed shielding provides detailed insight into the nature of the frontier orbitals, helping to relate the electronic structure of reaction intermediates with activity. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102] Applying this approach to alkyne metathesis catalysts, the chemical shift tensor components ( 11 >  22 > model compound with three tris(tert-butoxy)siloxy ligands, at low spinning rates (Table 4) (Table 4) with a maximum deviation of less than 20 ppm, while the calculated and experimental principal components differ more, possibly due to the presence, at least in part, of dynamics (vide infra).…”
Section: Trapping Of Reaction Intermediates On Supported and Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%