2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00351-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the binaural interaction component in wave P4 of the short-latency auditory evoked potentials in the cat: evaluation of serial depth recordings from the brainstem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that the BD component DN1 measured at the vertex is mainly due to the contralateral inhibition of the lemniscal field potentials that result from the discharge activity of IE-cells in the LSO. Additionally, at the level of the SOC, Ungan and Yagcioglu (2002) demonstrated a bilateral asymmetry of the BD showing a stronger response to contralateral leading stimuli. This study strongly supports the hypothesis that the IE-cells in the LSO are the main BD generators and validates the IEmodel of binaural interaction.…”
Section: Bd Model and Generationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They concluded that the BD component DN1 measured at the vertex is mainly due to the contralateral inhibition of the lemniscal field potentials that result from the discharge activity of IE-cells in the LSO. Additionally, at the level of the SOC, Ungan and Yagcioglu (2002) demonstrated a bilateral asymmetry of the BD showing a stronger response to contralateral leading stimuli. This study strongly supports the hypothesis that the IE-cells in the LSO are the main BD generators and validates the IEmodel of binaural interaction.…”
Section: Bd Model and Generationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a seminal paper, Ungan and Yagcioglu (2002) simultaneously measured BDs from a vertex electrode and a deep electrode in the LSO and the lateral lemniscus (LL) in cat. DN1 amplitude and latency as function of the ITD corresponded with the field potential measured at the level of the LL.…”
Section: Bd Model and Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The depth of the LSO was identified by the maximum evoked response. In addition, the binaural interaction component was evaluated to determine when the sum of right ear or left ear stimulation was different than the effect of binaural stimulation (see Finlayson and Caspary 1989;Wada and Starr 1989;Ungan and Yagcioglu 2002).…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of wave 3 correlates with the integrity of the MNTB or its output (Wada and Starr, 1989, 1983; Jalabi et al, 2013) although Boettcher (2002) suggested that it is based on the activity of the cochlear nucleus. Wave 4 in the gerbil and cat and wave 5 in humans are attributed to more central stages of the auditory pathway already representing binaural cues like neurons in the medial superior olive (MSO) and the lateral superior olive (LSO) and fibers from the superior olivary complex (SOC) to the lateral lemniscus (LL; Boettcher, 2002; Riedel and Kollmeier, 2002; Ungan and Yagcioglu 2002; Grothe et al, 2010). In humans (Riedel and Kollmeier, 2002), cats (Ungan et al, 1997; Ungan and Yagcioglu 2002) and rodents (Goksoy et al, 2005), a specific binaural interaction component (BIC) of the ABR has been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%