1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(96)01232-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the anomalous diffusion observed by MD simulation at the protein-water interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
38
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the calculated water self‐diffusion coefficient range from D = 1.44 × 10 −9 m 2 /s for a fit carried out over all the 520 ps MD simulation to D = 2.21 × 10 −9 m 2 /s for a fit carried out over the first 200 ps of trajectory. A similar behavior has been already reported and could be at the basis for the scattered D values reported in literature for water in hydrated protein systems (40–42). Indeed, a protein can influence the water mobility affecting its diffusion process, which cannot be described by Brownian dynamics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The values of the calculated water self‐diffusion coefficient range from D = 1.44 × 10 −9 m 2 /s for a fit carried out over all the 520 ps MD simulation to D = 2.21 × 10 −9 m 2 /s for a fit carried out over the first 200 ps of trajectory. A similar behavior has been already reported and could be at the basis for the scattered D values reported in literature for water in hydrated protein systems (40–42). Indeed, a protein can influence the water mobility affecting its diffusion process, which cannot be described by Brownian dynamics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…S6A). In general, after a few picoseconds, the MSD became proportional to t α (29). Linear dependence of the MSD on time (α = 1) is a signature of Brownian diffusive motion as observed for bulk water; α < 1 is a signature of anomalous "subdiffusion," which is characteristic of confined water and protein hydration water.…”
Section: Water Dynamics Within the Hourglass Deviates Dramatically Frommentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For the analysis of the NPT simulations, we stored the system coordinates every 10 ps, but this time interval is too long to reveal the details of water dynamics that occur on the picosecond timescale (29,30). Therefore, we carried out 40 NVE (constant number of particles N, volume V, and energy E) simulations of 50-ps length, saving configurations every 5 fs (Methods).…”
Section: Water Dynamics Within the Hourglass Deviates Dramatically Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When water molecules are confined to the proximity of the protein surface, anomalous diffusion can take place [41,42]. Both the geometrical complexity and the temporal disorder of the water dynamics, i.e., the residence time distribution of water molecules on different protein residues and the protein surface roughness [42], cause anomalous diffusional behaviour. These results show that the motion of water inside the βLG pores is quite different from that of free water.…”
Section: S525mentioning
confidence: 99%