2012
DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the 44-mm Behind-Armor Blunt Trauma Standard

Abstract: A number of armed assaults on public officials occurred in the early 1970s, which prompted the Lightweight Soft Body Armor Program to develop modern, concealable, soft body armor. Methodology needed to be developed to (1) determine the effectiveness of the soft body armor to stop bullet penetration and (2) assess the potential injury from nonpenetrating blunt impacts to the body. Extensive research was performed under the program to develop methodologies to assess soft body armor, including behind-armor blunt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical simulation results indicate that the BCS is not broken down by pistol cartridge, and the maximum depression depth of skin is 4.98 mm, which is less than 25 mm specified by the Chinese standard [32] and 44 mm specified by the NIJ standard [16]. Hence, the pistol cartridge does not directly shoot the human torso.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical simulation results indicate that the BCS is not broken down by pistol cartridge, and the maximum depression depth of skin is 4.98 mm, which is less than 25 mm specified by the Chinese standard [32] and 44 mm specified by the NIJ standard [16]. Hence, the pistol cartridge does not directly shoot the human torso.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to GA 141-2010 “Police ballistic resistance of body armor” [15], the backing materials (such as clay) are used to simulate the human torso to assess the bulletproof performance of body armor. In the case of a valid hit for bullet, the body armor can block the warhead, and the maximum backface signature is less than or equal to 25 mm, that is, the body armor can effectively protect the killing effect of the pistol cartridge, while the NIJ (National Institute of Justice) standard is 44 mm [16]. It is impossible to ascertain the injury situation of the human wearing the body armor, so the evaluation method is only suitable for evaluating the bulletproof performance of body armor, and it is also difficult to be applied to the evaluation of the protective performance of body armor to the human.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, gelatine has similar deformation response to Roma Plastilina No. 1 in terms of behind soft armor blunt trauma assessment (Prather et al, 1977;Hanlon and Gillich, 2012). A 250 × 150 × 50 mm gelatine block was put lightly in contact with, and behind, the sample to simulate a realistic boundary condition between the ballistic fabric and the soft tissue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (RP1) was reported to have comparable ballistic performance as the gelatin with the advantage that the residual cavity formed in RP1 was easily measured and could provide a value for the BFS. Consequently, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the U.S. Army adopted RP1 as the standard BWM for body armor [1,5,6]. While the performance standards for body armor have undergone periodic revisions, RP1 is still the required BWM [1,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%