2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.021802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules

Abstract: In a recent work [T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183601 (2010)] it was numerically shown that in a photonic 'molecule' consisting of two coupled cavities, near-resonant coherent excitation could give rise to strong photon antibunching with a surprisingly weak nonlinearity. Here, we show that a subtle quantum interference effect is responsible for the predicted efficient photon blockade effect. We analytically determine the optimal on-site nonlinearity and frequency detuning between the pump… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
419
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(442 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(32 reference statements)
19
419
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Two bare cavity modes are separated by ∆ o /2π = 118 GHz; a QD is resonant and strongly coupled to one of the modes (a) with interaction strength g/2π = 27.6 GHz (as discussed earlier, g = g 2 1 + g 2 2 , where g 1 and g 2 are the two values of QD-cavity interaction strengths obtained by fitting the PL spectra); mode b is the empty cavity. The mode b is driven and the second order autocorrelation g 2 (0) = b † b † bb b † b 2 of the transmitted light through cavity b is calculated [15]. We also assume the two cavities to have the same cavity decay rate, which is an average of the cavity decay rates measured from the two super-modes.…”
Section: Strong Coupling With a Single Qdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two bare cavity modes are separated by ∆ o /2π = 118 GHz; a QD is resonant and strongly coupled to one of the modes (a) with interaction strength g/2π = 27.6 GHz (as discussed earlier, g = g 2 1 + g 2 2 , where g 1 and g 2 are the two values of QD-cavity interaction strengths obtained by fitting the PL spectra); mode b is the empty cavity. The mode b is driven and the second order autocorrelation g 2 (0) = b † b † bb b † b 2 of the transmitted light through cavity b is calculated [15]. We also assume the two cavities to have the same cavity decay rate, which is an average of the cavity decay rates measured from the two super-modes.…”
Section: Strong Coupling With a Single Qdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in practice it is very difficult to drive only one cavity mode without affecting the other mode due to the spatial proximity of two cavities. This individual addressability is critical for good performance of the system [15] and to retain such a capability in a photonic molecule the cavities should be coupled via a waveguide [26].…”
Section: Strong Coupling With a Single Qdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, given the small values of typical nonlinear coefficients of most semiconducting and insulating materials [14], an unconventional photon blockade (UPB) process could facilitate achieving antibunched light emission from suitably engineered coupled modes [15]. Such mechanism is based on destructive quantum interference between distinct driven-dissipative pathways [16,17], and requires a significantly smaller optical nonlinearity than its conventional counterpart. It has been recently proposed that UPB might allow to achieve antibunched light * Electronic address: dario.gerace@unipv.it emission either in passive devices made of materials with a large χ (3) susceptibility, such as silicon [18], or in coupled optomechanical systems [19,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, 17, UPB can be expected to occur in such doubly resonant system even with g nl κ, thus relaxing the stringent conditions on the fundamental mode quality factor, Q 1,2 = ω 1,2 /κ. In particular, an analytic solution can be given for the optimal system parameters giving rise to strong antibunching [17]: laser frequency detuning, ∆ opt 1 = ∆ opt 2 = −κ/2 √ 3, and tunnel-coupling rate,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%