2003
DOI: 10.1029/2001jc001259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of shore‐normal channels from the shoreface of Sable Island, Canada

Abstract: [1] A suite of modern, shore-normal channels was discovered on the southern shoreface of Sable Island, Canada. Repetitive multibeam and side scan surveys of these features, as well as box coring and sampling, showed that the depressions were perennial features of the shoreface. They occurred in fine and medium sand and were most abundant indepths less than 20 m. They were up to 1 m deep and 50 m wide, increased in size seawards, and generally followed the seabed slope. The channels dominated the inner shorefac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These channels could also be interpreted as incised valley fills, but this seems unlikely due to that there are no evidence for this interval being subject to subaerial exposure, and no evidence for contemporaneous lowstand deposits. These channels could also be the deposits of shore-normal channels carved by storm-generated downwelling events (Héquette and Hill 1993;Amos et al 2003), but this does not explain that the subaqueous channels occur in areas in front of large distributary channels (Fig. 6), as this model would predict that these channels should be located throughout the study area.…”
Section: Subaqueous Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These channels could also be interpreted as incised valley fills, but this seems unlikely due to that there are no evidence for this interval being subject to subaerial exposure, and no evidence for contemporaneous lowstand deposits. These channels could also be the deposits of shore-normal channels carved by storm-generated downwelling events (Héquette and Hill 1993;Amos et al 2003), but this does not explain that the subaqueous channels occur in areas in front of large distributary channels (Fig. 6), as this model would predict that these channels should be located throughout the study area.…”
Section: Subaqueous Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is unlikely that rain caused the seabed erosion (Tolhurst et al, 2009) A possible mechanism of seabed erosion is enhanced wave dissipation when the tidal level was low and northeasterly winds caused wave breaking. This erosive process is similar to the formation of shore-normal channels reported by Amos et al (2003) in the sense that the erosion occurs during very short periods under less-energetic and low water level conditions. In the present case, turbid water induced by the enhanced dissipation may retreat across the intertidal zone along with ebb tides and transport sediment offshore ( Figure 9).…”
Section: Impact Of Breakwater Construction On Seabed Elevation Changesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These channels could also be interpreted as incised valley fills, but this seems unlikely owing to the fact that there is no evidence for this interval being subject to subaerial exposure, and no evidence for contemporaneous lowstand deposits. These channels could also be the deposits of shore-normal channels carved by storm-generated downwelling events (Héquette & Hill 1993;Amos et al 2003), but this does not explain that the subaqueous channels occur in areas in front of large distributary channels (Fig. 6), as this model would predict that these channels should be located throughout the study area.…”
Section: Subaqueous Channelsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These channels are interpreted to be turbidite-filled subaqueous channels linking river mouths to prodelta turbidite lobes, cut by river-fed hyperpycnal currents (Pattison 2005a, b;Pattison et al 2007). Several authors have described localized erosion near turbidite channels (Elliott 2000;Higgs 2004) and proximal turbidites (Amos et al 2003). Erosion due to bypassing turbidites is, therefore, a reasonable mechanism that may explain the presence of erosive offshore transition-zone deposits.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation