“…4b). Indeed, at the sparger, some bubbles were characterized by an ellipsoidal shape, and others by an irregular shape (i.e., due to the channeling effect (Hur et al, 2013)). …”
Section: Image Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the batch mode, the typical values of U trans found in the literature for air-water systems in bubble columns of diameter greater than 0.15 m range between 0.01 and 0.08 m/s under ambient operating conditions (Dargar and Macchi, 2006;Hur et al, 2013;Krishna et al, 1991;Letzel et al, 1999;Reilly et al, 1994;Ruzicka et al, 2001;Schumpe and Grund, 1986;Urseanu, 2000;Wilkinson et al, 1992;Zahradnik et al, 1997). The value depends mainly on the sparger type.…”
Section: Flow Regime Transitionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…30b). It is worth noting that the BSD at the sparger depends on many design parameters (i.e., the hole of the sparger and the flowrate) as reported by Hur et al (2013) and Geary and Rice (1991). For example, a sensitivity analysis made by Cao et al (2009) using the Geary and Rice (1991) model showed that increasing hole flowrate or decreasing hole dimensions lead to larger bubbles, whereas an increasing number of holes results in smaller bubbles detaching from the sparger.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image analysis has been mostly applied to rectangular/small-scale (Lau et al, 2013a(Lau et al, , 2013bZaruba et al, 2005) or medium scale (Schäfer et al, 2002) bubble columns, but there is a lack of studies concerning BSDs in largediameter bubble columns. Furthermore, studies analyzing the bubble size distributions near the sparger are uncommon (Hur et al, 2013), and the influence of the liquid velocity on the bubble shape and bubble size distribution is far from being understood (Besagni and Inzoli, 2016b). In the present study, we have applied a method based on human recognition of the bubble edge Besagni and Inzoli, 2016b).…”
“…4b). Indeed, at the sparger, some bubbles were characterized by an ellipsoidal shape, and others by an irregular shape (i.e., due to the channeling effect (Hur et al, 2013)). …”
Section: Image Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the batch mode, the typical values of U trans found in the literature for air-water systems in bubble columns of diameter greater than 0.15 m range between 0.01 and 0.08 m/s under ambient operating conditions (Dargar and Macchi, 2006;Hur et al, 2013;Krishna et al, 1991;Letzel et al, 1999;Reilly et al, 1994;Ruzicka et al, 2001;Schumpe and Grund, 1986;Urseanu, 2000;Wilkinson et al, 1992;Zahradnik et al, 1997). The value depends mainly on the sparger type.…”
Section: Flow Regime Transitionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…30b). It is worth noting that the BSD at the sparger depends on many design parameters (i.e., the hole of the sparger and the flowrate) as reported by Hur et al (2013) and Geary and Rice (1991). For example, a sensitivity analysis made by Cao et al (2009) using the Geary and Rice (1991) model showed that increasing hole flowrate or decreasing hole dimensions lead to larger bubbles, whereas an increasing number of holes results in smaller bubbles detaching from the sparger.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image analysis has been mostly applied to rectangular/small-scale (Lau et al, 2013a(Lau et al, , 2013bZaruba et al, 2005) or medium scale (Schäfer et al, 2002) bubble columns, but there is a lack of studies concerning BSDs in largediameter bubble columns. Furthermore, studies analyzing the bubble size distributions near the sparger are uncommon (Hur et al, 2013), and the influence of the liquid velocity on the bubble shape and bubble size distribution is far from being understood (Besagni and Inzoli, 2016b). In the present study, we have applied a method based on human recognition of the bubble edge Besagni and Inzoli, 2016b).…”
“…Typical values of U trans found in the literature for the air-water systems in bubble columns with diameters higher than 0.15 m range between 0.01 and 0.08 m/s at ambient operating conditions [24,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. The value depends mainly on the distributor type.…”
This paper investigates the countercurrent gas-liquid flow in an annular gap bubble column with a 0.24 m inner diameter by using experimental and numerical investigations. The two-phase flow is studied experimentally using flow visualizations, gas holdup measurements, and double fiber optical probes in the following range of operating conditions: superficial air velocities up to 0.23 m/s and superficial water velocities up to À0.11 m/s, corresponding to gas holdups up to 29%. The flow visualizations were used to observe the flow patterns and to obtain the bubble size distribution (BSD). The gas holdup measurements were used for investigating the flow regime transitions, and the double fiber optical probes were used to study the local flow phenomena. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Eulerian two-fluid modeling of the column operating in the bubbly flow regime is proposed using the commercial software ANSYS FLUENT. The three-dimensional (3D) transient simulations have been performed considering a set of nondrag forces and polydispersity. It is shown that the errors in the global holdup and in the local properties are below 7% and 16%, respectively, in the range considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.