2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of Magnetic Field in the Intracluster Medium: Primordial or Astrophysical?

Abstract: The origin of magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies is still an unsolved problem, which is largely due to our poor understanding of initial seed magnetic fields. If the seed magnetic fields have primordial origins, it is likely that large-scale pervasive magnetic fields were present before the formation of the large-scale structure. On the other hand, if they were ejected from astrophysical bodies, they were highly localized in space at the time of injection. In this paper, using turbulence dynamo models for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution from un-resolved gas motions by the finite numerical resolution in our scheme may underestimate the level of smallscale dynamo amplification, which gets independent from the ampitude of seed fields for large enough Reynolds number (e.g. Cho 2014;Beresnyak & Miniati 2016). If this is the case, the ∼ 0.1 − 0.2 µG we measured for our intracluster bridge in Sec.3.3.4 may be underestimated, even if to our knowledge this run is the most resolved so far for objects of this kind.…”
Section: Discussion: Physical and Numerical Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution from un-resolved gas motions by the finite numerical resolution in our scheme may underestimate the level of smallscale dynamo amplification, which gets independent from the ampitude of seed fields for large enough Reynolds number (e.g. Cho 2014;Beresnyak & Miniati 2016). If this is the case, the ∼ 0.1 − 0.2 µG we measured for our intracluster bridge in Sec.3.3.4 may be underestimated, even if to our knowledge this run is the most resolved so far for objects of this kind.…”
Section: Discussion: Physical and Numerical Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reynolds number achieved in simulations is also an important factor that directly affects the magnetic field growth. While the Reynolds number based on the full Spitzer viscosity in the ICM is believed to be of the order of Re ∼ 10 2 (e.g Cho 2014a), the reduced proton mean free path in the collisionless ICM can result in much larger Reynolds numbers (Beresnyak & Miniati 2016;Brunetti & Lazarian 2011b). This suggests that the fluid approximation provides a suited model for the properties of the ICM (e.g Santos-Lima et al 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike this, ICM turbulence is usually subsonic with M s 1/2 (see, e.g., Ryu et al 2008;Brunetti & Jones 2014). It also has crucial impacts on astrophysical phenomena in the ICM, including amplification of weak seed magnetic fields (e.g., Schekochihin et al 2004;Ryu et al 2008;Cho 2014). Magnetic fields permeated in turbulence appear in a variety of astrophysical objects and have huge impacts on them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%