2004
DOI: 10.1080/11250000409356639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of Madagascar's extant fauna: A perspective from amphibians, reptiles and other non‐flying vertebrates

Abstract: The origins of the highly endemic and partly very diverse fauna and flora of Madagascar were longtime unsolved and are still strongly disputed, although dispersalists are recently prevailing over advocates of Gondwanan vicariance. Madagascar has been separated from other continents and continental fragments since the Mesozoic, and the assumption of vicariance origins requires very old ages of the lineages involved. Herein I review the recent progress of knowledge on the molecular phylogenetic relationships of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(70 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the Late Cretaceous fauna of the Maevarano Fm (1, 4), including its ceratophryine anuran, bears little resemblance to that of modern Madagascar, major biotic changes clearly occurred on the island in the intervening period. When and how the ancestors of the endemic mantellid and microhylid anurans arrived on Madagascar remains controversial (5,6,8,12,18,19), but there is general agreement that these frogs did not diversify significantly until the Paleogene (5,6,12,18,19). Their radiation has been linked, at least in part, to the expansion of rainforests, but may also have been facilitated by the extinction of archaic faunal elements (5), including ceratophryines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, as the Late Cretaceous fauna of the Maevarano Fm (1, 4), including its ceratophryine anuran, bears little resemblance to that of modern Madagascar, major biotic changes clearly occurred on the island in the intervening period. When and how the ancestors of the endemic mantellid and microhylid anurans arrived on Madagascar remains controversial (5,6,8,12,18,19), but there is general agreement that these frogs did not diversify significantly until the Paleogene (5,6,12,18,19). Their radiation has been linked, at least in part, to the expansion of rainforests, but may also have been facilitated by the extinction of archaic faunal elements (5), including ceratophryines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the Indian subcontinent continued north to contact Eurasia, and Madagascar was left 430 km from Africa, isolated by the deep Mozambique Channel (4). The remarkable diversity and endemicity of the Malagasy biota has prompted intense debate as to the role of vicariance and, more recently, of dispersal in its history (5)(6)(7). The frogs of Madagascar are important to this discussion because amphibians are generally considered to be poorly suited to transoceanic dispersal (7), although exceptions are known (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the more striking examples is the Fijian iguana Brachylophus; its close relationship to New World species [7,59] implies trans-Pacific dispersal from the Americas to the South Pacific. Similarly, the existence of iguanas in Madagascar implies oceanic dispersal [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%