1978
DOI: 10.1038/274324a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of lamination in deep sea, fine-grained sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the defmi tions and criteria to recognise contourites were estab lished by Stow (1977Stow ( , 1982, Stow and Bowen (1978), Stow and Lovell (1979), Lovell and Stow (1981), Stow et al (1986) and by the papers compiled in a special issue edited by Stow and Piper (1984a). Many of these papers deal with the problem of distinguishing fine grained turbidites from contourites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the defmi tions and criteria to recognise contourites were estab lished by Stow (1977Stow ( , 1982, Stow and Bowen (1978), Stow and Lovell (1979), Lovell and Stow (1981), Stow et al (1986) and by the papers compiled in a special issue edited by Stow and Piper (1984a). Many of these papers deal with the problem of distinguishing fine grained turbidites from contourites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organoporosity is by no means the only porosity within shales, nor is Ar-ion milling the only way to image pores in shales. [13] have identified the following pore types using FESEM and standard SEM techniques [4] porous floccules which appear similar to laboratory-induced floccules (Figures 2A -F), (2) porous fecal pellets, with as much as 15% micro-porosity, (3) fossil fragments such as Tasminites spores ( Figure 4A), sponge spicules whose original, hollow central chambers may be partially or completely preserved after burial ( Figures 1B, 4B, 4C), coccospheres and their spines, who's chambers are also hollow and often open ( Figures 4D, 4E), and foraminifera with open chambers ( Figure 4F) (4) mineral grains such as pyrite framboids ( Figure 5B); (5) microchannels within shale matrix which probably are either micro-burrows and/or bounding surfaces of scours or micro-sedimentary structures (Figures 1D, 1E); and (6) fractures which occur at micron and larger scales ( Figure 5D) [13]. Some of these pore types -such as floccules which are common in many shales ( Figure 2) [4,13] -are probably at least as important as organo-porosity in storing and providing migration pathways for hydrocarbon molecules.…”
Section: Shale Porosity and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these and other studies, a list of potential transport, deposition, and reworking processes include (in addition to hemipelagic rain): (1) hyperpycnal flows [5,8,11,12], (2) turbidity current flows, (3) tempestites (storm deposits) and wave-reworked deposits [6]; and (4) contourites (bottomhugging slope, oceanic currents) [2]. In order for claysized particles to move along the sea floor by tractive processes, as evidenced by the sedimentary structures, they must behave in a hydraulically similar manner to coarser grains.…”
Section: Shale Depositional Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a larger, m+ scale, their grain size may be vertically homogenous, suggestive of either hemipelagic rain or complete bioturbation, or they may reveal fining upward patterns typical of mud turbidites [8][9][10] or coarseningupward, then fining-upward patterns which, according to Mulder and others [11], are the product of deposition from hyperpycnal flows [12][13][14]. At a still larger parasequence to sequence scale, they may display systematic stacking patterns of lithofacies [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%