2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.054429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of insulating and nonferromagnetic SrRuO3 monolayers

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of the RuO 6 octahedron in ruthenium oxides is dominant for physical properties. [ 13,42–45 ] This study clarifies the changes in the structure of the RuO 6 octahedron contained in CRO at the interface above the substrate. The structure and composition of the samples were investigated via atomic‐solution inverse contrast annular bright‐field (ABF)/high‐angle annular dark field (HAADF)‐STEM imaging.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structure of the RuO 6 octahedron in ruthenium oxides is dominant for physical properties. [ 13,42–45 ] This study clarifies the changes in the structure of the RuO 6 octahedron contained in CRO at the interface above the substrate. The structure and composition of the samples were investigated via atomic‐solution inverse contrast annular bright‐field (ABF)/high‐angle annular dark field (HAADF)‐STEM imaging.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Ca and Ru are visible in the HAADF image, whereas O, a lighter element, is visible using ABF. [ 43–45 ] The periodic arrangement of Nd, Ga, Ca, and Ru can be seen in the vicinity of the interface from HAADF imaging in Figure 5c,e and Figure S16 (Supporting Information). The projected angle θ (defined in Figure 5f inset) between the Ru and O atoms in Figure 5d was measured and plotted at the Ru and Ga sites above and directly below the interface indicated by the dotted line, respectively (Figure 5f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] Efforts in getting rid of such an either insulating or nonferromagnetic dead layer are highly challenging, which is dependent on the elegant growth control of stoichiometry of SRO, usually turning out the debated experimental results. [30][31][32][33] In recent experiments, the giant photoresponse has been observed in LaAlO 3 /STO interface via inserting a monolayer Mott SRO. [34] These results suggest that ultrathin Mott SRO grown on the STO substrate may provide an ideal platform to not only eliminate the dead layer, but also investigate phase transition through the facile light irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, MO 6 octahedron rotation significantly alters the electronic structure and may induce phase transitions, often accompanying changes in physical properties. A prime example is a well-known ferromagnetic metallic TMO perovskite SRO for which various characteristics appear with RuO 6 octahedral rotations; a large octahedral rotation angle favors an insulating antiferromagnetic phase whereas a small octahedral rotation prefers a metallic ground state with ferromagnetism [9][10][11]. As such, numerous attempts to control the MO 6 octahedron angle and characteristics of TMO systems have been reported [10,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%