1991
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of human chromosome 2: an ancestral telomere-telomere fusion.

Abstract: We have identified two allelic genomic cosmids from human chromosome 2, c8.1 and c29B, each containing two inverted arrays of the vertebrate telomeric repeat in a head-to-head arrangement, 5'(TTAGGG),,-(CCCTAA),,3'. Sequences fln g this telomeric repeat are characteristic of present-day human pretelomeres. BAL-31 nuclease experiments with yeast artificial chromosome clones of human telomeres and fluorescence in situ hybridization reveal that sequences flanking these inverted repeats hybridize both to band 2q13… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
236
2
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
13
236
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the centromere of human chromosome 2 should have been derived from a chromosome similar to PTR 12 or PPA 12, while the centromere from the chromosome similar to PTR 13 or PPA 13 was inactivated or lost (Dutrillaux 1979). This hypothesis is supported by Analysis of human chromosome 2 with a DNA microlibrary recent in situ hybridization experiments with centromere and telomere DNA sequences of human chromosome 2 (Wells et al 1990, Ijdo et al 1991, Avarello et al 1992, Baldini et al 1993. Close to the assumed fusion point (2q13) a relict of an alphoid domain was found by in situ hybridization of a satellite DNA clone under low hybridization stringency (Avarello et al 1992, Baldini et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the centromere of human chromosome 2 should have been derived from a chromosome similar to PTR 12 or PPA 12, while the centromere from the chromosome similar to PTR 13 or PPA 13 was inactivated or lost (Dutrillaux 1979). This hypothesis is supported by Analysis of human chromosome 2 with a DNA microlibrary recent in situ hybridization experiments with centromere and telomere DNA sequences of human chromosome 2 (Wells et al 1990, Ijdo et al 1991, Avarello et al 1992, Baldini et al 1993. Close to the assumed fusion point (2q13) a relict of an alphoid domain was found by in situ hybridization of a satellite DNA clone under low hybridization stringency (Avarello et al 1992, Baldini et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This alphoid domain may indicate the presence of the inactivated centromere in human band 2q21. In addition, proximal to 2q21, telomeric sequences were found in band 2q13 by in situ hybridization of DNA probes containing inverted arrays of the vertebrate telomeric repeat in a head-to-head arrangement (Wells et al 1990, Ijdo et al 1991. This band should therefore represent the fusion point of the telomeres of the two primate homologs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, three classes of ITSs were identified [15]: (i) subtelomeric ITSs, located within subtelomeric domains and composed of extended arrays (usually several hundreds of base pairs), including many degenerate units; they probably arose from recombination events involving chromosome termini [16]; (ii) short internal ITSs, located away from telomeres and composed of relatively few TTAGGG units; these ITSs are likely to have been generated during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks that occurred during evolution [17]; (iii) one fusion ITS, located in 2q14, derived from the end fusion between the two ancestral chromosomes that gave rise to human chromosome 2 [18]. No clear indication of any particular function of ITSs has been provided so far.…”
Section: Thomas Simonet Et Al 1029mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, it has been suspected that that human chromosome 2 is a recent species-specific fusion of two ancestral primate chromosomes for several decades (Ijdo et al 1991). More recent studies (Rogers et al 2006) have confirmed that the mapping above is correct, and the section that the rhesus macaque 12 and 13 maps to are called 2q and 2p, respectively.…”
Section: Mapping the Rhesus Monkey Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is merely a very large dataset for which we can obtain ground truth by other methods (Ijdo et al 1991;Rogers et al 2006).…”
Section: Mapping the Rhesus Monkey Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%