2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.13.039594
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin, Conservation, and Loss of Alternative Splicing Events that Diversify the Proteome in Saccharomycotina Budding Yeasts

Abstract: Many eukaryotes use alternative splicing to express multiple proteins from the same gene. However, while the majority of mammalian genes are alternatively spliced, other eukaryotes use this process less frequently. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been successfully used to study the mechanism of splicing and the splicing machinery, but alternative splicing in yeast is relatively rare and has not been extensively studied. We have recently shown that the alternative splicing of SKI7/HBS1 is widely … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand how copy number variation originating from gene duplication influences the diversity and number of AS events (Hurtig et al., 2020; Marshall et al., 2018), we classified genes based on their copy numbers for N. lutea , N. nucifera , and Arabidopsis and compared how the number of AS events differs between genes with different copy numbers (Figure S5). To make the observed tendencies independent of the number of genes per species, we only considered genes with orthologs in each of the considered species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand how copy number variation originating from gene duplication influences the diversity and number of AS events (Hurtig et al., 2020; Marshall et al., 2018), we classified genes based on their copy numbers for N. lutea , N. nucifera , and Arabidopsis and compared how the number of AS events differs between genes with different copy numbers (Figure S5). To make the observed tendencies independent of the number of genes per species, we only considered genes with orthologs in each of the considered species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%