2017
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and prevalence of the accessory phrenic nerve: A meta‐analysis and clinical appraisal

Abstract: The accessory phrenic nerve (APN) is a common anatomical variant with differing reports of prevalence in the literature. It can be injured during operative procedures to the neck and thorax or by regional anesthetic techniques in its vicinity. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the prevalence and origins of the APN. The databases PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, and Web of Science were searched comprehensively, followed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we introduced the CATAM rubric and used it to critically appraise a recently published anatomical MA (Kacprzyk et al, 2020). There have been other anatomical MAs recently published (Aldabe et al, 2019; Bellier et al, 2020; Berthaume & Bull, 2021; Cheruiyot et al, 2021; Dreher et al, 2018; Graves et al, 2017; Harvie et al, 2019; Koziej et al, 2020; Morelli et al, 2019; Nallikuzhy et al, 2018; Roberts et al, 2021; Sirico et al, 2019; Solewski et al, 2021; Stefura et al, 2018; Tomaszewska et al, 2018; Tomaszewska et al, 2018; Tomaszewski et al, 2017; Tomaszewski et al, 2017; Vikse et al, 2016a, 2016b; Whitley et al, 2020; Yammine, 2013, 2014b, 2014c, 2014d; Yammine et al, 2015; Yurasakpong et al, 2021). We believe that the running paper that we used is an exemplary anatomical MA (Kacprzyk et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this article, we introduced the CATAM rubric and used it to critically appraise a recently published anatomical MA (Kacprzyk et al, 2020). There have been other anatomical MAs recently published (Aldabe et al, 2019; Bellier et al, 2020; Berthaume & Bull, 2021; Cheruiyot et al, 2021; Dreher et al, 2018; Graves et al, 2017; Harvie et al, 2019; Koziej et al, 2020; Morelli et al, 2019; Nallikuzhy et al, 2018; Roberts et al, 2021; Sirico et al, 2019; Solewski et al, 2021; Stefura et al, 2018; Tomaszewska et al, 2018; Tomaszewska et al, 2018; Tomaszewski et al, 2017; Tomaszewski et al, 2017; Vikse et al, 2016a, 2016b; Whitley et al, 2020; Yammine, 2013, 2014b, 2014c, 2014d; Yammine et al, 2015; Yurasakpong et al, 2021). We believe that the running paper that we used is an exemplary anatomical MA (Kacprzyk et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, the presence of an accessory phrenic nerve (APN) is common and has been shown in 36.5% to 61.8% of phrenic nerves with variable origin, course, and communication with the respective phrenic nerve. 27 , 28 The most common origin of an APN was the ansa cervicalis, which arises from C3 and C4, or the nerve to the subclavius, which arises from C5 and C6. 27 , 28 Because of an unforeseen anatomical variation, direct needle injury to the phrenic nerve may cause permanent hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 36% to 62% of persons can have an accessory phrenic nerve arising from the superior trunk of the brachial plexus, ansa cervicalis, or nerve to the subclavius. 3,7 What is more interesting is that the nerve and its accessory components, when present, seem to have a highly variable course as they traverse the outlet. To the surgeon operating in the thoracic aperture on a routine basis, locating the nerve in these areas is simply a mild inconvenience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%