2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and physical-chemical control of topaz crystallization in felsic igneous rocks: Contrasted effect of temperature on its OH–F substitution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 182 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the generally accepted origin of the topaz from the Greifenstein granite as a late phase must be scrutinized because the diamond, graphite, SiC, cristobalite, and coesite inclusions in topaz imply a different formation of this topaz type. Note that such hydroxyl-rich topaz has been identified in ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks [22].…”
Section: Natural Diamond and Moissanite In Inclusions In Granitementioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the generally accepted origin of the topaz from the Greifenstein granite as a late phase must be scrutinized because the diamond, graphite, SiC, cristobalite, and coesite inclusions in topaz imply a different formation of this topaz type. Note that such hydroxyl-rich topaz has been identified in ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks [22].…”
Section: Natural Diamond and Moissanite In Inclusions In Granitementioning
confidence: 92%