2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00132-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

50
310
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
50
310
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar left lateralisation has also been demonstrated for mechanisms involved in the temporal allocation of attention which have also been linked with motor planning (Hammond, 1982;Coull & Nobre, 1998;Coull, Frith, Buchel & Nobre, 2000). Human subjects with lesions to this area of the brain often have difficulties in the generation and the temporal control of motor sequences -known as ideomotor apraxia (DeRenzi Motti & Nichelli, 1980;DeRenzi, 1982;Harrington & Haaland, 1992;Rushworth, Nixon, Renowden, Wade & Passingham, 1997;Haaland et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Similar left lateralisation has also been demonstrated for mechanisms involved in the temporal allocation of attention which have also been linked with motor planning (Hammond, 1982;Coull & Nobre, 1998;Coull, Frith, Buchel & Nobre, 2000). Human subjects with lesions to this area of the brain often have difficulties in the generation and the temporal control of motor sequences -known as ideomotor apraxia (DeRenzi Motti & Nichelli, 1980;DeRenzi, 1982;Harrington & Haaland, 1992;Rushworth, Nixon, Renowden, Wade & Passingham, 1997;Haaland et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although more data is needed to clarify the issue, this region appears to be more commonly activated by tasks involving the measurement of sub-second intervals than by those involving the measurement of supra-second intervals alone. Supporting this, nine (Coull, Frith, Buchel, & Nobre, 2000;Coull & Nobre, 1998;Gruber et al, 2000;Penhune, Zattore, & Evans, 1998;Rao et al, 1997;Roland, Skinhoj, & Lassen, 1981;Schubotz et al, 2000;Schubotz & Von Cramon, 2001) of the 21 reviewed papers involving measurement of sub-second intervals report peaks of activity in the frontal operculum, while only three of the nine examining supra-second intervals alone (Larasson et al, 1996;Lewis & Miall, 2002;Rao et al, 2001) report activity there. Because frontal opercular activity is seen in studies which either control for movement using subtractions (Gruber et al, 2000;Schubotz et al, 2000), or require no movement or preparation for movement during the test condition (Schubotz & Von Cramon, 2001), it seems unlikely that activity there is entirely due to motor confound.…”
Section: Activity Greater During the 06 S Intervalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This finding is especially interesting as all stimuli used in this experiment were visual. Two prior studies have described activity in the temporal cortex during time measurement tasks involving no auditory cues (Coull et al, 2000;Larasson et al, 1996). Others have shown auditory cortex activity during task phases which come after the cessation of auditory cues, such as continuation tapping after auditory synchronisation (Rao et al, 1997), or memory encoding after presentation (Sakai et al, 1999).…”
Section: Activity Greater During the 06 S Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynamic Attending Theory; Drake et al, 2000;Jones & Boltz, 1989). A second experimental technique employs a temporal analogue of the Posner (1980) spatial cueing task; participants can be effectively cued by a visual symbol to attend to a specific point in time-one of two temporal intervals following the cue (Coull, Frith, Büchel, & Nobre, 2000;Coull & Nobre, 1998;Griffin, Miniussi, & Nobre, 2002;Miniussi, Wilding, Coull, & Nobre, 1999; for review see Nobre, 2001). …”
Section: Attention To Time-mentioning
confidence: 99%