“…Although more data is needed to clarify the issue, this region appears to be more commonly activated by tasks involving the measurement of sub-second intervals than by those involving the measurement of supra-second intervals alone. Supporting this, nine (Coull, Frith, Buchel, & Nobre, 2000;Coull & Nobre, 1998;Gruber et al, 2000;Penhune, Zattore, & Evans, 1998;Rao et al, 1997;Roland, Skinhoj, & Lassen, 1981;Schubotz et al, 2000;Schubotz & Von Cramon, 2001) of the 21 reviewed papers involving measurement of sub-second intervals report peaks of activity in the frontal operculum, while only three of the nine examining supra-second intervals alone (Larasson et al, 1996;Lewis & Miall, 2002;Rao et al, 2001) report activity there. Because frontal opercular activity is seen in studies which either control for movement using subtractions (Gruber et al, 2000;Schubotz et al, 2000), or require no movement or preparation for movement during the test condition (Schubotz & Von Cramon, 2001), it seems unlikely that activity there is entirely due to motor confound.…”