2006
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200600698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oriented Crystallisation on Supports and Anisotropic Mass Transport of the Metal‐Organic Framework Manganese Formate

Abstract: The oriented in situ crystallisation of microporous manganese(II) formate [Mn(HCO 2 ) 2 ] on different porous supports (e.g. porous alumina and graphite) has been investigated. The anisotropic growth of Mn(HCO 2 ) 2 was examined by Xray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The intracrystalline diffusion of methanol in Mn(HCO 2 ) 2 was studied by observation of the sorption kinetics by interference microscopy (IFM). It was found that untreated discs of porous alumina and graphite supports e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Often pinholes and cracks of membranes as well as poorly performing microporous materials show this type of selectivity. Even though there have been increasing attempts to develop MOF-based molecular sieve membranes, [5][6][7][8][9][10] only in recent publications membranes are reported, which perform better than the Knudsen separation. [11][12][13][14][15] In view of the cost of development and the uncertainty of the performance of new MOFs, a computerbased screening and pre-selection method is desired.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201002066mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Often pinholes and cracks of membranes as well as poorly performing microporous materials show this type of selectivity. Even though there have been increasing attempts to develop MOF-based molecular sieve membranes, [5][6][7][8][9][10] only in recent publications membranes are reported, which perform better than the Knudsen separation. [11][12][13][14][15] In view of the cost of development and the uncertainty of the performance of new MOFs, a computerbased screening and pre-selection method is desired.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201002066mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Arnold et al prepared membranes of Mn(HCO 2 ) 2 , which contains a 1-D pore structure, on both graphite and alumina supports. 62 Diffraction analysis of 60 the composites revealed the 1-D channel system of the framework was parallel rather than perpendicular to the alumina although the pore system could become better oriented dependent on synthetic conditions. Oriented microporous MOF membranes can be prepared from 65 randomly oriented seed layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most successful methods to prepare such films utilises 30 a 'seeding and secondary growth' approach, which is employed to favour MOF nucleation on the substrate rather than in solution and has now been applied to a number of MOF types. It is noted that the properties of the seed layers in terms of adherence to the support, seed particle size, anisotropy and orientation, as well as 35 how the support itself has been prepared 62 , are all important factors for the successful preparation of supported MOF membranes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for a bare substrate (without any functional groups, like silica), crystal sizes increase as deposition process proceeds [29]. However, no crystal is generated when the filtrated mother solution is kept where it is.…”
Section: Deposition On Substratementioning
confidence: 98%