2021
DOI: 10.1785/0220200362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientations of Broadband Stations of the KOERI Seismic Network (Turkey) from Two Independent Methods: P- and Rayleigh-Wave Polarization

Abstract: The correct orientation of seismic sensors is critical for studies such as full moment tensor inversion, receiver function analysis, and shear-wave splitting. Therefore, the orientation of horizontal components needs to be checked and verified systematically. This study relies on two different waveform-based approaches, to assess the sensor orientations of the broadband network of the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI). The network is an important backbone for seismological research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many of these stations have been used in previous shear-wave splitting studies (Figure 2b; Biryol et al, 2010;Confal et al, 2016;Evangelidis et al, 2011;Hatzfeld et al, 2001;Kaviani et al, 2011Kaviani et al, , 2013Lemnifi et al, 2017;Olive et al, 2014;Paul et al, 2014;Sandvol et al, 2003;Yolsal-Çevikbilen, 2014), we re-analyze all data to ensure a consistent approach and, for long-running, permanent stations, to extend the temporal coverage of constraints. Additionally, a recent analysis of KOERI seismic stations (network KO in Figure 2b), measuring polarizations of P waves and Rayleigh waves (Büyükakpınar et al, 2021), shows that many of the permanent stations in Turkey included in our analysis are, or have been at some stage, misaligned. For all stations with a misalignment estimate of   5 , we have corrected horizontal component azimuths prior to analysis.…”
Section: Seismological Data Used In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many of these stations have been used in previous shear-wave splitting studies (Figure 2b; Biryol et al, 2010;Confal et al, 2016;Evangelidis et al, 2011;Hatzfeld et al, 2001;Kaviani et al, 2011Kaviani et al, , 2013Lemnifi et al, 2017;Olive et al, 2014;Paul et al, 2014;Sandvol et al, 2003;Yolsal-Çevikbilen, 2014), we re-analyze all data to ensure a consistent approach and, for long-running, permanent stations, to extend the temporal coverage of constraints. Additionally, a recent analysis of KOERI seismic stations (network KO in Figure 2b), measuring polarizations of P waves and Rayleigh waves (Büyükakpınar et al, 2021), shows that many of the permanent stations in Turkey included in our analysis are, or have been at some stage, misaligned. For all stations with a misalignment estimate of   5 , we have corrected horizontal component azimuths prior to analysis.…”
Section: Seismological Data Used In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Büyükakpınar et al. (2021) estimated relatively insignificant sensor misorientation (as 7.6° ± 1.3) at the station AYDB as 7.6° ± 1.3 through P ‐wave polarization analysis performed on 84 events. The details of the method used for polarization analysis are given in Supporting Information S1 (Figure S5 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There are several methods that can constrain sensor misorientation from seismic waveform records. Previous studies used the body wave polarization measurement (Shin et al, 2009;Niu and Li, 2011;Lee and Sheen, 2015;Scholz et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2016;Ensing and van Wijk, 2018;Ojo et al, 2019;Braunmiller et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020;Büyükakpınar et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2020), surface wave polarization measurement (Stachnik et al, 2012;Rueda and Mezcua, 2015;Scholz et al, 2017;Doran and Laske, 2017;Ojo et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020;Büyükakpınar et al, 2021), comparative analysis of observed and synthetic waveforms (Ekström and Busby, 2008;Ekström and Nettles, 2018;Braunmiller et al, 2020), ambient noise crosscorrelation (Zha et al, 2013;Lee and Rhie, 2015;Xu et al, 2018;Ensing and van Wijk, 2018;Zeng et al, 2020), and receiver function analysis (Lim et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2020). In this study, we explored two methods based on P-wave polarization for estimating the misorientation of seismometers considering computational efficiency and relative ease in implementation for rapid assessment of the station quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%