1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(91)82093-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientational disorder and motion of weakly attached cross-bridges

Abstract: In a relaxed muscle fiber at low ionic strength, the cross-bridges may well be in states comparable to the one that precedes the cross-bridge power stroke (Schoenberg, M. 1988. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 226:189-202). Using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and (saturation transfer) electron paramagnetic resonance (ST-EPR) techniques on fibers labeled with maleimide spin label, under low ionic strength conditions designed to produce a majority of weakly-attached heads, we have established that (a) relaxed labele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are experimental data obtained by several different methods indicating that a transition from disordered to ordered binding of the myosin head while attached to actin produces the power stroke. ESR studies of AM-S1 in solution, myofibrils, and fibers all indicate that a large fraction of myosin heads in contracting muscle fibers are weakly bound to actin and are disordered and highly mobile on the microsecond time scale (26)(27)(28). X-ray diffraction and mechanical studies support this view (29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are experimental data obtained by several different methods indicating that a transition from disordered to ordered binding of the myosin head while attached to actin produces the power stroke. ESR studies of AM-S1 in solution, myofibrils, and fibers all indicate that a large fraction of myosin heads in contracting muscle fibers are weakly bound to actin and are disordered and highly mobile on the microsecond time scale (26)(27)(28). X-ray diffraction and mechanical studies support this view (29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This leads to an equal distribution between the M1 and M2 LC domain orientations. The catalytic domain is disordered (10,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51). Upon activation, one head of the dimer binds actin without an LC domain rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most models of muscle contraction consider the myosin head as the active component in force generation, EPR studies have targeted the rotational motions and orientational distributions of the myosin head (e.g., Thomas and Cooke, 1980;Cooke et al, 1982; Address correspondence to Dr. D. D. Berger et al, 1989;Barnett and Thomas, 1989;Fajer et al, 1991). However, a number of investigations suggest that actin undergoes conformational changes upon the binding of S1 and that these changes are necessary for the activation ofmuscle contraction (e.g., Prochniewicz-Nakayama and Yanagida, 1982;Miki et al, 1987;Prochniewicz and Yanagida, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%