1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.37.1212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of Atoms by Collisions with Inclined Surfaces

Abstract: We have measured large orientations for Ar n states excited by 300-keV Ar + impact on solid Cu surfaces at grazing incidence. We report circulary polarized light fractions of up to 76% and interpret the excitation mechanism as an orbital-angular-momentum effect. As an application of this new excitation scheme, a zero-field level-crossing experiment is presented.We report new experiments which confirm and extend the recent observation that the excitation of fast ion beams by impact with inclined solid amorphous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent asymmetry in the treatment of the orbital and the spin part of p(to) stresses that we are mainly interested in the influence of the target-spin polarization on S/I, whereas-in the present investigation -the p~kl)(LL) are treated as adjustable parameters (irrespective of the question of the way in which PL may be constructed from pt and PLy). This point will become clear from our attempt -given below-to take account of the values that were previously determined from experiment [2] 9…”
Section: P~k)(jj)= Z ~ (--1)s'+s+s+k2(2j+l)(2s+1)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The apparent asymmetry in the treatment of the orbital and the spin part of p(to) stresses that we are mainly interested in the influence of the target-spin polarization on S/I, whereas-in the present investigation -the p~kl)(LL) are treated as adjustable parameters (irrespective of the question of the way in which PL may be constructed from pt and PLy). This point will become clear from our attempt -given below-to take account of the values that were previously determined from experiment [2] 9…”
Section: P~k)(jj)= Z ~ (--1)s'+s+s+k2(2j+l)(2s+1)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If, on the other hand, the ion-target collision would merely generate an ionic excited state without any electron exchange, no substantial influence of the target magnetization is expected to occur because of the very short interaction time (< 10-~3 s). Assuming LS-coupling for the partners participating in an ion-target collision as done in [2], the effect of electron-target spin polarization in a loss-capture model may be accounted for in the following manner: Let us assume that-as a first step-an impinging ion loses another electron to the target. The intermediate ion may be described by a definite angular momentum L1 and spin $1 if in addition to LS-coupling we assume that in a parentage approximation of the final state only one parent contributes significantly [9].…”
Section: Initial-state Preparation By Ion-scattering At Spin Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…collision processes for the He + energies from 10 to 355 keV.As one possible approach to the understanding of the microscopic mechanisms yielding the recently discovered large orientation of scattered ions (atoms) after ion-beam surface interaction at grazing incidence (IB-SIGI) [1][2][3][4][5] we investigate the orientation of scattered ions (atoms) resulting from ion-atom collisions with impact parameter selection. The experimental problem in such investigations is usually solved by time-consuming standard coincidence measurements [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%