2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation effects on spectral emission features of quasars

Abstract: We present an analysis of the orientation effects in SDSS quasar composite spectra. In a previous work we have shown that the equivalent width EW of the [OIII] λ5008Å line is a reliable indicator of the inclination of the accretion disk. Here, we have selected a sample of ∼15,000 quasars from the SDSS 7th Data Release and divided it in subsamples with different values of EW [OIII] . We find inclination effects both on broad and narrow quasars emission lines, among which an increasing broadening from low to hi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
8
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have the same BH masses at fixed σ ⋆ ∼ 185 km s −1 , the AGN2 should have a virial factor ∼7 times higher than the RM AGN1. However, as also discussed in Paper II, according to the AGN unified model, AGN2 are viewed at larger inclinations (more edge-on) than AGN1, and there are indications that the ffactor decreases with increasing inclination Pancoast et al 2014;Bisogni et al 2017). This would imply that an even smaller f -factor would probably be more appropriate for AGN2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In order to have the same BH masses at fixed σ ⋆ ∼ 185 km s −1 , the AGN2 should have a virial factor ∼7 times higher than the RM AGN1. However, as also discussed in Paper II, according to the AGN unified model, AGN2 are viewed at larger inclinations (more edge-on) than AGN1, and there are indications that the ffactor decreases with increasing inclination Pancoast et al 2014;Bisogni et al 2017). This would imply that an even smaller f -factor would probably be more appropriate for AGN2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We note that the measured [O III] and [O IV] fluxes could be underestimated if the NLR extends beyond the slit size of the instruments due to the closeness of the source. Finally, following Risaliti et al (2011) and Bisogni et al (2016), if we assume that the [O III] luminosity is an indicator of the intrinsic luminosity and is emitted isotropically, and that the underlying continuum is due to an optically thick accretion disk, then the observed [O III] EW (EW obs ) can give us an estimate of the orientation of the accretion disk. For an accretion disk that is observed with an inclination θ, we get EW obs = EW * / cos θ, where EW * is the EW as measured in a face-on configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as is well known, the broad Hβ emission line shows some asymmetry. Accounting for it has been done in various ways in the literature: some authors include several Gaussian components to fit the broad Hβ lines (Shen et al 2011;Trakhtenbrot & Netzer 2012), others use a broken powerlaw with an asymmetric slope around the central wavelength which is then convolved with a Gaussian (Bisogni, Marconi & Risaliti 2017). In our case, we simply add one Gaussian in the region between the Hβ and the [OIII] lines.…”
Section: A Relation Between the Broad And Narrow Line Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%