“…Evaluation assessments have also been proposed which compared some of these measures in particular fields such as stereo correspondence (Chambon and Crouzil, 2003), image registration (Zitová and Flusser, 2003) and image motion (Giachetti, 2000). Generally speaking, apart from classical approaches which will be discussed in Section 2, many robust measures for visual correspondence have been proposed in literature (Tombari et al, 2007), (Crouzil et al, 1996), (Scharstein, 1994), (Seitz, 1989), (Aschwanden and Guggenbuhl, 1992), (Martin and Crowley, 1995), (Fitch et al, 2002), (Zabih and Woodfill, 1994), (Bhat and Nayar, 1998), (Kaneko et al, 2003), (Ullah et al, 2001). A taxonomy which includes the majority of these approaches is proposed in (Chambon and Crouzil, 2003).…”