1978
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(78)90155-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation averages for drawn rubber networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of small stretching ratios (the gaussian range), N can be decidedly replaced by Nn (the number average of N), in order to consider a distribution of segmental numbers. In the medium range of 2, the influence of a distribution of N has not yet been noticed within the model of [4]. This seems also true for a distribution of t/l-ratios in the case of the extended floating rod model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of small stretching ratios (the gaussian range), N can be decidedly replaced by Nn (the number average of N), in order to consider a distribution of segmental numbers. In the medium range of 2, the influence of a distribution of N has not yet been noticed within the model of [4]. This seems also true for a distribution of t/l-ratios in the case of the extended floating rod model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…(18). With the assumptions of Nobbs and Bower [4] the validity region of equation (5) can be extended beyond 2 = V~ by separating the fraction of fully extended chains during drawing and handle them subsequently f (2) as rigid rods (i.e. described by eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…͑vi͒ The framework is limited to the draw ratio corresponding to bridging chains of DP 0 monomers being fully stretched. In order to predict birefringence at higher draw ratios, modifications to account for pseudoaffine deformation 16,68 are required. Care must be exercised here because our framework already considers the chains to be aligned along the stretch direction ͑i.e., they are not randomly oriented as in threedimensional networks͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this elongation, the amorphous chains are fully stretched, and further elongation cannot be modeled by our current framework. Ward et al 16 and Nobbs and Bower 68 suggested a pseudoaffine deformation framework to address the deformation corresponding to amorphous chains being stretched beyond h max . In such a framework, beyond max , the deformation is only due to orientation of the chains along the stretch direction.…”
Section: A Photoelasticity Considering Strain-induced Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%