2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organs at Risk Considerations for Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: What Is Safe for Lung Parenchyma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
54
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
5
54
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion requirements were patients with at least 6 months of follow up after completion of SBRT (n = 91) or documented evidence of symptomatic RP with less than 6 months of follow up (n = 2). Near equivalent tumoricidal (α/β = 10 Gy) biological effective dose schemes (BED10) of 100-105 Gy were required in the interest of reporting homogeneous fractionation schemes as recommended by the AAPM (e.g., 50/5, 48/ 4, 60/8) [5,15]. Diagnosis of RP required clinical symptoms (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Inclusion requirements were patients with at least 6 months of follow up after completion of SBRT (n = 91) or documented evidence of symptomatic RP with less than 6 months of follow up (n = 2). Near equivalent tumoricidal (α/β = 10 Gy) biological effective dose schemes (BED10) of 100-105 Gy were required in the interest of reporting homogeneous fractionation schemes as recommended by the AAPM (e.g., 50/5, 48/ 4, 60/8) [5,15]. Diagnosis of RP required clinical symptoms (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cough or dyspnea requiring increased steroids from baseline with or without interference in activities of daily living) and radiographic evidence, to qualify as an event. As a result, all patients in this study deemed to have "symptomatic RP" were Grade 2+ per CTCAE v3.0/4.0/5.0 or Grade 3+ per RTOG toxicity grading criteria, similarly as analyzed by the AAPM [5]. Chart reviewers recorded patient and tumor characteristics, and were blinded to DVH parameters during the chart review process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The detailed grading definitions were previously described in our previous publications (2,12), consistent with a recent update from the expert panel of an AAPM task ( Supplementary Table S1; ref. 26).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Radiation Pneumonitismentioning
confidence: 99%