2008
DOI: 10.1021/ja711010h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organometallic Uranium(V)−Imido Halide Complexes: From Synthesis to Electronic Structure and Bonding

Abstract: Reaction of (C5Me5)2U(=N-2,4,6-(t)Bu3-C6H2) or (C5Me5)2U(=N-2,6-(i)Pr2-C6H3)(THF) with 5 equiv of CuX(n) (n = 1, X = Cl, Br, I; n = 2, X = F) affords the corresponding uranium(V)-imido halide complexes, (C5Me5)2U(=N-Ar)(X) (where Ar = 2,4,6-(t)Bu3-C6H2 and X = F (3), Cl (4), Br (5), I (6); Ar = 2,6-(i)Pr2-C6H3 and X = F (7), Cl (8), Br (9), I (10)), in good isolated yields of 75-89%. These compounds have been characterized by a combination of single-crystal X-ray diffraction, (1)H NMR spectroscopy, elemental a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
168
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
31
168
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the methyl proton resonance of C 5 Me 5 by 1 H NMR spectroscopy reveals an upfield shift in the order I (9.85 ppm) < Br (8.76 ppm) < Cl (7.85 ppm) << F (3.19 ppm). This trend has been observed before in other cyclopentadienyl complexes and it is directly correlated with the π-donating ability of the halide ligand [51]. Similarly, comparison of the methyl peaks of the C 5 Me 4 Et ligand of 36 (11.9, 8.5, 7.8, 7.8 and 6.6 ppm) and 38 (11.9, 9.11, 9.07, 8.3 and 7.8 ppm) shows the same pattern, where the peak positions of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 U(O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )(Br) appear downfield from those of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 U(O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )(Cl).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparison of the methyl proton resonance of C 5 Me 5 by 1 H NMR spectroscopy reveals an upfield shift in the order I (9.85 ppm) < Br (8.76 ppm) < Cl (7.85 ppm) << F (3.19 ppm). This trend has been observed before in other cyclopentadienyl complexes and it is directly correlated with the π-donating ability of the halide ligand [51]. Similarly, comparison of the methyl peaks of the C 5 Me 4 Et ligand of 36 (11.9, 8.5, 7.8, 7.8 and 6.6 ppm) and 38 (11.9, 9.11, 9.07, 8.3 and 7.8 ppm) shows the same pattern, where the peak positions of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 U(O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )(Br) appear downfield from those of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 U(O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )(Cl).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Bonding analysis using DFT on the model complexes (CsMes)2 U(=N-Ph)(F) ( 1 28) and (CsMeshU(=N-Ph)(I) (129) supports these findings and describes the multiple bonding between the uranium metal center and imido nitrogen as consisting of one a-and two 1t-interactions with variable 50 participation of 5f and 6d orbitals from the uranium center. 90 The X /Y ligand did not significantly influence the imido parameters. However, as expected on the basis of the ionic radius of the XIY atom S6 the U-X/Y bond length decreases down the series, with U-F < U-Nsp2 < U-Nsp3 < U-CI < U-S < 55 U-Br < U-S e < U-I < U-Te.…”
Section: Smentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Andersen and co-workers reported the oxidation of (CsH4Me)3U(THF) (89) Complex 90 was characterized structurally (Figure 22). The most notable geometric parameters are the short U=N Figure 22 Ball-and-stick representation of (C 5 H. Meh U(=N-Ph) (90).…”
Section: -E1ectron Oxidation Of Trivalent Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such coordination in the diuranium(IV) complex, throughout the ketimide (1,4-phenylenediketimide) bridging ligand, which appears also in bis(imido) diuranium(V) species [63,90], is likely to maximize the possibility of electronic and magnetic communication between the two metallic centres. Different authors [106,115,120] attributed this peculiar linear U-N-C coordination, to a significant participation of the uranium 5f orbitals in metal-N bonding. This U-N(ketimide) coordination exhibits both r and p interactions between the central metal and bis(ketimide) bridging ligand via the nitrogen electron pairs.…”
Section: Description Of the Molecular Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%