1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(95)05496-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organometallic compounds of the lanthanides XCVII. Synthesis and crystal structures of monomeric bis(ethyltetramethylcyclopentadienyl) amide and alkyl derivatives of the lanthanides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conformation of the amido ligands is remarkable. The angle N-Si-C(14) (105.82(13)°) is clearly smaller than the angles N-Si-C(15) (114.08(13)°) and N-Si-C(16) (114.82(14)°), which is in accordance with the situation in (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 YN-(SiMe 3 ) 2 (107.4/115.1°) 29 and in (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 SmN(SiMe 3 ) 2 (106.3/114.6°). 30 These distortions are the consequence of γ-agostic interactions between the methyl groups of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amido ligand and the unsaturated samarium center, as was discussed also in the cases of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 YN(SiMe 3 ) 2 29 and (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 SmN(SiMe 3 ) 2 .…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conformation of the amido ligands is remarkable. The angle N-Si-C(14) (105.82(13)°) is clearly smaller than the angles N-Si-C(15) (114.08(13)°) and N-Si-C(16) (114.82(14)°), which is in accordance with the situation in (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 YN-(SiMe 3 ) 2 (107.4/115.1°) 29 and in (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 SmN(SiMe 3 ) 2 (106.3/114.6°). 30 These distortions are the consequence of γ-agostic interactions between the methyl groups of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amido ligand and the unsaturated samarium center, as was discussed also in the cases of (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 YN(SiMe 3 ) 2 29 and (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 SmN(SiMe 3 ) 2 .…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The largest deviation of the ideal 120°angle is, with respect to the large butenyl substituent on the cyclopentadienyl ligands, slightly smaller for Cp-Sm-Cp (130.49(4)°) than in (C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 YN(SiMe 3 ) 2 (Cp-Y-Cp ) 132.59°) 29 and in (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 SmN(SiMe 3 ) 2 (Cp-Sm-Cp ) 132.8°). 30 There is no coordination of the olefinic double bond of the CH 2 dCHCH 2 CH 2 C 5 Me 4 ligand to the samarium center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…125 Hz in sp 3 C–H bonds. ,,, The low coordinate tris-bis­(trimethylsilyl)­methyl lanthanide complexes, Ln­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 3 ] 3 , with Ln = Y, La, Ce, and Sm, contain unusually short distances between the metal and one −SiMe 3 group of the pendant alkyl in their X-ray crystal structures. The distortion of a CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 group is also a general pattern observed in the crystal structures of Cp* 3– x Ln­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] x , where x = 1 or 2. Regardless of the reasons, these secondary interactions are a signature of the electrophilicity of the lanthanide in these compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Y-N(1) and Y-N(2) bond lengths are 0.084 and 0.079 Å respectively, shorter than the Y-N(3) bonds, but essentially the same as those in 7, due to this competition for lone-pair donation between silicon and yttrium that occurs at N(3) but not at the more basic, non-silylamide centres N(1) and N(2). The Y-N(SiMe 3 ) 2 bond length of 2.272(3) Å is essentially the same as those in the homoleptic complex [Y{N(SiMe 3 ) 2 } 3 ] 33 (2.224(6) Å) and in the heteroleptic complexes [YCp* 2 {N(SiMe 3 ) 2 }] 20 (two independent molecules in the unit cell; Y(1)-N(1) 2.274(5) Å, Y(2)-N(2) 2.253(5) Å) and [Y(C 5 Me 4 Et) 2 -{NSiMe 3 ) 2 }] 34 (2.276(3) Å). As for 6, the relatively low yttrium coordination number and the proximal silylmethyl groups lead to the possibility of agostic interactions between these functionalities in the solid state.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Yttrium Complexes Supported By {Arn(ch 2 ) 3 Na...mentioning
confidence: 99%