2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organohalogenated contaminants (OHCs) in the serum and hair of pet cats and dogs: Biosentinels of indoor pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
87
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The four isomers were detected in both species, but at very low concentrations (the median value was 0 ng/g lw in all cases). The mean values of this group of pollutants in dogs were higher than those reported in Pakistan in 2013 (Ali et al 2013), but the median values were much lower, indicating that there was a high dispersion of the concentrations. However, it should be noted that the sample sizes of both studies were very different, being much higher in this study (n = 87 vs. 16), so probably the median value of this study more accurately reflects the actual level of contamination in this species.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Ocps In Dog and Human Plasmacontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The four isomers were detected in both species, but at very low concentrations (the median value was 0 ng/g lw in all cases). The mean values of this group of pollutants in dogs were higher than those reported in Pakistan in 2013 (Ali et al 2013), but the median values were much lower, indicating that there was a high dispersion of the concentrations. However, it should be noted that the sample sizes of both studies were very different, being much higher in this study (n = 87 vs. 16), so probably the median value of this study more accurately reflects the actual level of contamination in this species.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Ocps In Dog and Human Plasmacontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Reversely, in samples of canine plasma the situation was radically different, as the median value was 0 ng/g lw, and detection frequency did not exceed 8% for any of these analytes. This had already been described in dogs of Pakistan and Japan (Kunisue et al 2005;Ali et al 2013), and also in Russian wolves (Shore et al 2001), so it has been suggested that canines, unlike many other mammalian species, do not accumulate these pollutants throughout their life, probably because they are equipped with efficient mechanisms of biotransformation and elimination (Kunisue et al 2005). All the evidences set out above, in which the values of most of the contaminants in this group were much higher in humans than in dogs, especially so different pollution profiles between the two species, indicate that the dog is not a good indicator of human exposure to OCPs.…”
Section: Dog Plasmamentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, there are numerous authors that have explored the potential of dogs and cats in this sense (Andrade et al, 2010;Baker et al, 2005;Calderón-Garciduenas et al, 2001;Heyder and Takenaka, 1996;Rabinowitz et al, 2008;Reif, 2011). However, in the case of exposure to POPs the results have been variable, because although some authors have suggested that cats seem to be adequate sentinels of human exposure to these contaminants (Ali et al, 2013;Dirtu et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2012), the role of dogs as such does not seem so clear Sévère et al, 2015). One reason is that several authors have reported that, intriguingly, dogs and other canines exhibit extremely low levels of some of the more abundant POPs in most mammals (including cats and humans), such as DDE and DDT, which suggests a higher metabolic capacity of these animals (Georgii et al, 1994;Kunisue et al, 2005;Ruiz-Suárez et al, 2015;Sévère et al, 2015;Shore et al, 2001;Storelli et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%