Abstract:The enantioselective organocatalytic Michael addition in aqueous solution was compared with the reaction performed under solvent‐free ball‐milling conditions. A range of pyrrolidine‐derived organocatalysts were tested in the addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes. Both procedures afforded good yields, diastereoselectivities, and enantioselectivities. The best catalyst in aqueous media was O‐lauroyl‐trans‐4‐hydroxyproline, whilst the ball‐milling technique was most‐efficient with α,α‐diphenyl‐2‐pyrrolidinemethan… Show more
“…36 (7) in a ball-mill. 34 As already mentioned, the use of chiral thioureas as organocatalysts in asymmetric Michael additions has been highly successful. In an additional example, the reaction of a-nitrocyclohexanone with various nitrostyrenes, in the presence of 2.5 mol% of catalyst 9, resulted in efficient Michael adduct formation, in high yields (80-95%), with high diastereoselectivity (94 : 6 to 98 : 2 diastereomeric ratios), and excellent enantiomeric ratios (96 : 4 to 99 : 1) (Scheme 4.7).…”
Section: Asymmetric Michael Additionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…34 In particular, a,a-diphenylprolinol trimethylsilyl ether (7) gave the desired Michael products in yields in the range 44-97%, and with diastereoselectivities that reached 95 : 5 diastereomeric ratios, and good enantioselectivities (62-94% ee) (Scheme 4.5). A salient observation is that by employing HSBM the yields of the reaction can be quantitative after just 1 h reaction time, which corresponds to a reduction of more than twenty times in the reaction time required under the best conditions in solution employing organocatalyst O-lauroyl-trans-4-hydroxyproline (Scheme 4.5).…”
Section: Asymmetric Michael Additionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A salient observation is that by employing HSBM the yields of the reaction can be quantitative after just 1 h reaction time, which corresponds to a reduction of more than twenty times in the reaction time required under the best conditions in solution employing organocatalyst O-lauroyl-trans-4-hydroxyproline (Scheme 4.5). 34 Recently, Xu and co-workers reported the use of chiral squaramide derivatives as hydrogen bonding donor catalysts for the Michael addition reaction of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with nitroolefins under solvent-free conditions using a planetary ball-mill. The importance of carrying out the reaction in the absence of solvents was evident as only 0.5 mol% of the organocatalyst was required to successfully perform the asymmetric reaction between 2,4-pentanedione and various aromatic b-nitrostyrenes.…”
“…36 (7) in a ball-mill. 34 As already mentioned, the use of chiral thioureas as organocatalysts in asymmetric Michael additions has been highly successful. In an additional example, the reaction of a-nitrocyclohexanone with various nitrostyrenes, in the presence of 2.5 mol% of catalyst 9, resulted in efficient Michael adduct formation, in high yields (80-95%), with high diastereoselectivity (94 : 6 to 98 : 2 diastereomeric ratios), and excellent enantiomeric ratios (96 : 4 to 99 : 1) (Scheme 4.7).…”
Section: Asymmetric Michael Additionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…34 In particular, a,a-diphenylprolinol trimethylsilyl ether (7) gave the desired Michael products in yields in the range 44-97%, and with diastereoselectivities that reached 95 : 5 diastereomeric ratios, and good enantioselectivities (62-94% ee) (Scheme 4.5). A salient observation is that by employing HSBM the yields of the reaction can be quantitative after just 1 h reaction time, which corresponds to a reduction of more than twenty times in the reaction time required under the best conditions in solution employing organocatalyst O-lauroyl-trans-4-hydroxyproline (Scheme 4.5).…”
Section: Asymmetric Michael Additionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A salient observation is that by employing HSBM the yields of the reaction can be quantitative after just 1 h reaction time, which corresponds to a reduction of more than twenty times in the reaction time required under the best conditions in solution employing organocatalyst O-lauroyl-trans-4-hydroxyproline (Scheme 4.5). 34 Recently, Xu and co-workers reported the use of chiral squaramide derivatives as hydrogen bonding donor catalysts for the Michael addition reaction of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with nitroolefins under solvent-free conditions using a planetary ball-mill. The importance of carrying out the reaction in the absence of solvents was evident as only 0.5 mol% of the organocatalyst was required to successfully perform the asymmetric reaction between 2,4-pentanedione and various aromatic b-nitrostyrenes.…”
“…Recently, Sebesta and co-workers compared the enantioselective organocatalytic Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes in aqueous solution with the reaction performed under solvent-free ball-milling conditions catalysed by pyrrolidine-derived organocatalysts (Scheme 6) [45]. Both the procedures provided the product in good yield, poor to high diastereoselectivity, and moderate to high enantioselectivity.…”
SummaryBall-milling and pestle and mortar grinding have emerged as powerful methods for the development of environmentally benign chemical transformations. Recently, the use of these mechanochemical techniques in asymmetric organocatalysis has increased. This review highlights the progress in asymmetric organocatalytic reactions assisted by mechanochemical techniques.
“…There is a remarkable difference between the reactions of aldehydes and of ketones: no matter whether the Michael addition occurs in a catalytic or in a stoichiometric fashion, with a polymer‐bound pyrrolidine‐type catalyst, in a ball mill, microwave‐assisted, in the presence of an ionic liquid, in protic, aprotic, polar or non‐polar solvents, with acidic, basic or hydrocarbon side chains on the pyrrolidine moiety (see Scheme ), as an inter‐ or intramolecular step of so‐called domino sequences of reactions, or with acceptors other than nitroolefins (see lower part of Scheme ), a reversal of enantioselectivity between aldehydes and ketones has been observed. In the overall process the trigonal centers of the aldehyde or ketone α ‐carbonyl carbon and of the β ‐nitroolefin carbon couple with relative topicity lk in both cases, but the 1.4‐induction by the stereogenic center in the 2‐position of the pyrrolidine ring reverses: it is a [ lk , lk ‐1.4]‐process with aldehydes and a [ lk , ul ‐1.4]‐process with ketones (see Scheme ) ,…”
It has been suggested that the origin of regio-and stereoselectivity in Michael additions of pyrrolidine enamines is achieved by thermodynamic rather than kinetic control through distinct conformational preferences of the enamines. We assess this proposal by elaboration of a computational protocol that warrants sufficient accuracy. The small energy differences between the conformers necessitate a high accuracy of the electronic structure method which, in addition, must allow for computationally feasible calculations of a large number of conformers. Our protocol is based on density functional theory which we validated against explicitly correlated coupled cluster theory. The results are in agreement with the available experimental data, but illustrate that conformational preferences determined for one enamine are not readily transferable to other types of enamines. We found that an appropriate conformational sampling is inevitable to arrive at meaningful conclusions. Most prominently, s-cis and strans conformers are similarly stable for aldehyde-and ketone-derived enamines. The regio-and stereoselectivity in Michael additions of pyrrolidine-derived enamines can not be explained by pronounced stability differences of the enamine isomers and conformers in general, disproving the thermodynamic-control hypothesis. The elucidation of the origin of regio-and stereoselectivity requires further theoretical investigations of the elementary steps of Michael additions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.