Organizing professional work and services through institutional complexity – how institutional logics and differences in organizational roles matter

Abstract

How is the complexity of contemporary professional work and services organized differently by management at the strategic level and professionals at the operational level? And what are the implications for managing this complexity? Drawing on literatures on institutional complexity, organizational roles and the analyses of case study data from interviews, observations and documents at a large public service provider in Norway, this article advances the understanding of management in complex organizations and makes the following three contributions to the institutional logics literature. First, we show how multiple institutional logics have different functions at strategic and operational levels, resembling a dynamic interplay in organizing professional work and services. Second, we show how these differences in handling multiple logics are contingent upon the different roles of the strategic managers and operational professionals. Finally, we advance the understanding of what institutional complexity may involve in organizations by disclosing how the significant conflicts stem not only from the presence of multiple logics, but also from differences within the organizations in how multiple logics are handled. Our findings have implications for the planning and management of organizational design and implementation strategies and demonstrate the utility of the institutional complexity perspective for managing complexity in contemporary organizations.

Rising Every Time We Fall: Organizational Fortitude and Response to Adversities

“…For instance, it is likely that manifesting organizational resilience depends on access to resources and their quality, such as human, social, emotional, and material capital, which can vary among different organization forms. In addition, we know that different organizational settings variously shape social relationships in and around work (e.g., Duncan, 1973; Høiland & Klemsdal, 2022; Kossek, Lewis, & Hammer, 2009; Stensaker & Falkenberg, 2007), which may have an impact on organizational resilience. Future research could also build on our insights to design real-time rather than retrospective studies.…”

Fragmented care trajectories in municipal healthcare: Local sensemaking of digital documentation

“…Research on institutional logic shows that HCPs apply a vast range of logics in daily practice. 32 – 35 Inspired by Frederiksen and Beedholm, 36 we operationalise Weick's concept of cue framing in four salient institutional logics: Public management logic Market logic Medical profession logic Care profession logic The public management logic relates to public administration with a focus on legitimacy and policy. The market logic relates to finance and focuses on productivity and efficiency.…”

Counter-Institutional Identities and Product Innovation: “Core-Satellite” as a Response to Competing Logics Shaping Artisan Businesses

“…Multiple-logic context entails the appropriate responses to avoid unexpected consequences (Berman, 2012). There are different ways for organizations or individuals to respond to the co- existence of multiple logics ranging from Dismissing (defiance, deletion, denial), Separating (compromise, compartmentalize), Cumulative (acquiescence, aggregation, rein in), Creative (manipulation, integration, forge) as reviewed by Battilana and Lee (2014), leverage, bolster, and hybridize (Perkmann et al, 2019), compartmentalization (Høiland & Klemsdal, 2022), blending, separating and demarcating (Anderson-Gough et al, 2022), redirecting, reinforcing, and reassuring (Malhotra et al, 2021). Organizations are required to take actions that contend with the competing demands from conflicting logics (Pache & Santos, 2010; Thornton et al, 2012).…”