2016
DOI: 10.1177/0278364916649248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing objects by predicting user preferences through collaborative filtering

Abstract: As service robots become more and more capable of performing useful tasks for us, there is a growing need to teach robots how we expect them to carry out these tasks. However, different users typically have their own preferences, for example with respect to arranging objects on different shelves. As many of these preferences depend on a variety of factors including personal taste, cultural background, or common sense, it is challenging for an expert to pre-program a robot in order to accommodate all potential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, relative object placement instructions do not allow for fine-grained target specification due to its inherent ambiguity. Addressing this issue would require learning user preferences from feedback [25]. Second, we observe some failure cases for large object placements, because of missing 3D priors of the objects to be placed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, relative object placement instructions do not allow for fine-grained target specification due to its inherent ambiguity. Addressing this issue would require learning user preferences from feedback [25]. Second, we observe some failure cases for large object placements, because of missing 3D priors of the objects to be placed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, ref. [26] addressed personal preferences by combining a relation model for learning preferences for arranging objects on a shelf with object detection. However, while their approach could even successfully handle conflicting preferences, it also missed subtle differences between spatial relations in terms of their extent.…”
Section: Scene Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While each user can have a different preference, our goal is to cluster the users to a small set of dominant preferences. Such groups of similar users, also called personas, can be built manually from questionnaires [33] or through collaborative filtering [34], [35]. Other related work includes identifying different driver styles [36]- [38] using features from vehicle trajectories, human motion prototypes [39] for robot navigation and human preference stereotypes for human-robot interaction [40].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%