Organized elite power and clean energy: A study of negative policy experimentations with renewable portfolio standards

Abstract

Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) is one of the most widely adopted clean energy policies in the U.S. However, organized elite power groups, backed by ample political and economic resources, have been known to lead RPS termination efforts. In the context of state renewable energy politics, organized elite power includes legislators affiliated with American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and anti‐renewable energy business groups. Focusing on the roles of organized elite power, this study investigates the drivers of the formulation of RPS rollback (goal freeze) and termination bills, which we refer to collectively as negative policy experimentations. We find that RPS termination attempts are explained by the presence of ALEC legislators and anti‐renewable energy business groups, whereas RPS goal freeze bills are better explained by conditions of policy operations. This study contributes to the policy process theory by providing critical insights into the post adoption decisions, including policy termination and rollback legislations, with a focus on the role of organized elite power.

The contribution of clean energetics based on energy technology (EnergyTech) to the reduction of production waste and the fight against climate change: Legal regulation issues

“…This paper proves that the transition to clean energetics and its contribution to the reduction of pollution and the fight against climate change is determined not only by technologies (in addition to Qu et al, 2021;Solgi et al, 2022;Wei et al, 2019), corporate social responsibility (in addition to Davoodi et al, 2021;Ghanem and Crosbie, 2021), and state ecological standards (in addition to Jang and Yi, 2022) but also by EnergyTech institutes, the influence of which is undervalued in the existing literature.…”

Mechanisms and challenges of renewable energy cooperation in Northeast Asia

“…The three Northeast Asian countries, despite their high energy consumption mostly from imports, have so far failed to take a collective stance in their interactions with energy-exporting countries or blocs. Thus, in international energy markets, these countries usually pay a higher price due to a lack of coordination (Jang & Yi, 2022).…”

Policy advocacy, network formation and network governance

“…In the literature of policy theory, policy network, a communication network among government officials, think tanks, and interest groups around specific policy issues, is increasingly seen as an important meso-level concept linking macro-level political institutions and micro-level individual behaviors (Lubell et al, 2012). In the clean energy policy network being considered, the clean energy advocacy groups have increasing influence over the energy policy making and implementation, by forming coalitions to advocate for the passage of clean energy legislations and fostering the dissemination of knowledge regarding the necessity and importance of a clean economy (Jang & Yi, 2022; Yi, 2018).…”