“…The remaining 46 papers were carefully read in order to evaluate their eligibility, and a further 18 papers were eliminated: their main focus was on a different incivility context (i.e., cyber incivility, civility, tolerance for workplace incivility); they did not directly measure a source of workplace incivility or turnover intention (i.e., measuring counterproductive work behavior, negative work outcome); or they did not explicitly reveal necessary statistics, and we were unable to obtain those from the authors (see Figure 1 ). As a result, 28 papers were included in the final selection [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 49 , 50 , 57 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. Some papers included two or three studies, some investigated the relationship between two different sources of incivility and turnover intention, and some compared findings in separate samples and over time.…”