Organizational sustainability schemes align with weak sustainability

Abstract

While sustainability research is expansive, studies of business‐internal practices and resulting sustainability outcomes are largely unexplored. This research fills this gap by assessing the sustainability schemes that organizations internally employ to guide sustainability efforts. Content analysis is applied to 20 environmentally oriented sustainability schemes, through the triangulated lenses of strong sustainability and sensemaking theories. Each scheme is quantitatively assessed for positioning within the Stages of Sustainability model and rank abundance curves are generated to compare relative sustainability strength among the schemes for potential recommendations in practice or future research. Results show that 100% of the sustainability schemes in this study align with various forms of weak sustainability, although five commendable schemes are more advanced than the others. Given this finding, it is expected that applying the sustainability schemes from our sample in research and practice will perpetuate weak, business‐as‐usual, sustainability while prolonging the wait for strong ecological sustainability. Novel contributions of this research include empirical evidence to support claims that sustainability schemes are aligned with weak sustainability, and the identification of the sustainability strength of sustainability schemes. Additionally, numerous calls from researchers to consider sustainability strength in research are heeded. Implications for practitioners, scheme developers, and academics relate to the development of schemes, business‐internal practices, research, and teaching that aligns with ecological science‐oriented, strong sustainability instead of the current approach that aligns with weak sustainability.

Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies

“…The first perspective is practical. This study did not only assess the authenticity, transparency, and objectivity of each cosmetics and personal care company's environmental activities but also provided a basis for cross-company comparisons to pressure the industry to take action [35,36,57]. This perspective is significant because it encourages the environmental activities of OEM/ODM companies and distributors, which have been neglected despite their growing influence, and lays the groundwork for the need to develop common standards and frameworks for monitoring the environmental activities of companies involved in cosmetics and personal care [105].…”

“…Companies with more active IR activities have been shown to disclose more sustainability performance [35]. To encourage companies to be sustainable, an organized sustainability plan based on international standard disclosure guidelines is needed [36].…”

The Analysis of Legal Regulations for Establishing and Operating Reuse Centers or Points

“…As stated by Nilashi et al (2019), nowadays sustainability is recognized as one of the most important paradigms of development and is included in the international and national strategies of almost all organizations. The schemes used by organizations to manage sustainability efforts are evaluated by Demastus and Landrum (2023) in their research. According to Hicks and Nergard (2023), the sustainability of a particular place is also influenced by the physical and social infrastructure of the environment.…”

Design for Circular Economy in a Strong Sustainability Paradigm

“…; sufficiency is advocated as required to complement efficiency and circularity in a truly sustainable system, in which growth is in itself arguable. -Corporate sustainability management has also fallen short in contributing to sustainable development [39], and most corporate management systems and practices are framed around a weak sustainability perspective [22,40,41]. Once CE (and particularly circular design) is embedded in corporate sustainability frameworks, there is a need to ensure that it follows a strong sustainability perspective.…”