Organizational Reform and Changing Ethics in Public Administration: A Case Study on 18th Century Dutch Tax Collecting

Abstract

Although ethics underlying public administration obviously changes over time, it remains largely unknown just how, when, or why this happens. This article presents a study on organizational reform in the system of taxation in Holland around 1748. Comparative use of Max Weber's characteristics of bureaucratization provides a historical perspective on the link between organizational reform and ethical change in public tax administration and also sheds light on other contemporary issues in public management, such as a public-private distinction and the legitimacy of public administration. The case addresses important theoretical questions as well. Do organizations change existing (ethical) ideas or is it actually the other way around? How much do time and sequencing matter when explaining such historical processes? How much strategic action is involved in designing new institutions? I argue how an eclectic institutionalist approach is necessary to answer such questions in general and to increase our understanding of organizational reform in relation to changing ethics in particular, bringing into perspective all too straightforward causal links between the two.

O impacto da criação da Funpresp sobre os benefícios previdenciários dos servidores públicos federais

“…O Brasil não é o único país a ter um regime exclusivo para servidores públicos (Palacios e Whitehouse, 2006). Em vários países como os EUA (Mitchell et al, 2001) e Holanda (Kerkhoff, 2009) a criação de regimes para funcionários públicos antecede a criação de sistemas previdenciários para trabalhadores do setor privado. Como apontam Hustead e Hustead (2001), a existência de regimes diferenciados (com benefícios mais elevados) pode ser justificada pelo menor rendimento e pelo fato de algumas carreiras no serviço público serem bastante específicas.…”

Princely Patronage and Patriot Cause: Corruption and Public Value Dynamics in the Dutch Republic (1770s–1780s)

“…From a "Weberian" point of view, corruption occurs as a result of deficient rationalization. It is a phase on the route from patrimonial authority, based on kinship, heritage, or wealth, to rational legal authority, based on rule of law, fixed procedures, neutrality, and other characteristics of Weber's ideal type (Kerkhoff, 2011;Raadschelders & Rutgers, 1996, p. 97; see also Rubinstein, 1983).…”

The Integrity of Governance

“…As this excerpt suggests, corruption, and even more so the broader field of ethics and integrity, is a blind spot in much of the work by historians. 10 Nevertheless, there are exceptions, and the interest seems to be increasing (see Tiihonen, 2003;Kerkhoff et al, 2010;Kerkhoff, 2011;Rothstein, 2011). This growing interest is an important development in that historians illuminate and specify the general argument that integrity and corruption of governance are related to "context."…”