Implementation Science 3.0 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Readiness for Change: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Need to Know

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars suggest that organizational readiness is a primary predictor for successful implementation [ 16 ], whereas others have shown that failure to establish sufficient readiness accounts for one half of all unsuccessful organizational change efforts [ 17 ]. A recent review by Weiner et al [ 18 ] presents the state of the art of theoretical definitions of change readiness and evidence on how and why it matters. The authors conclude that change readiness is often operationalized as individual attitudes toward change (how people think or feel about change), which does not correspond to the everyday discourse on readiness, which connotes a state of preparedness to do something or for something (how prepared people are to act or respond to support change implementation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some scholars suggest that organizational readiness is a primary predictor for successful implementation [ 16 ], whereas others have shown that failure to establish sufficient readiness accounts for one half of all unsuccessful organizational change efforts [ 17 ]. A recent review by Weiner et al [ 18 ] presents the state of the art of theoretical definitions of change readiness and evidence on how and why it matters. The authors conclude that change readiness is often operationalized as individual attitudes toward change (how people think or feel about change), which does not correspond to the everyday discourse on readiness, which connotes a state of preparedness to do something or for something (how prepared people are to act or respond to support change implementation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, timely and accurate change communication and employee involvement in the change process might be positively associated with readiness. Finally, individual characteristics such as psychological ownership and job satisfaction might promote change readiness [ 18 ]. Likewise, the literature on implementing health promotive initiatives in schools has highlighted that preparation for change within the school organization is crucial for successful implementation [ 19 – 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational readiness to implement refers to the extent to which an organization is both willing and able to implement a new initiative (Scaccia et al 2015). There is no consensus about the conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness (Miake-Lye et al 2020, Livet et al 2019, Weiner et al 2020. Traditionally, most scholars have viewed readiness as a psychological construct; however, recently, Scaccia et al (2015) have proposed that readiness consists of both psychological and structural dimensions (Weiner et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus about the conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness (Miake-Lye et al 2020, Livet et al 2019, Weiner et al 2020. Traditionally, most scholars have viewed readiness as a psychological construct; however, recently, Scaccia et al (2015) have proposed that readiness consists of both psychological and structural dimensions (Weiner et al 2020). Hence, Scaccia and co-authors (2015) suggest, that the overall readiness is a function of the organizations' (1) motivation to implement a specific intervention, (2) general capacity, and (3) innovation-specific capacity (Scaccia et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the consensus stopped at an agreement that managing organizational change is more important than ever before; an axiom that has only escalated in repetition with the passing years. How to make change happen successfully, however, depends on a myriad of other assumptions and variables, like an organization's readiness for change (Weiner, Clary, Klaman, Turner and Alishahi-Tabriz, 2020), the political, institutional and technological context (Waeger and Weber, 2019), human responses and commitments to change (Raeder and Bokova, 2019) and resilience in the face of upheaval (Brown and Abuatiq, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%