2005
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Partnerships in China: Self-Interest, Goal Interdependence, and Opportunism.

Abstract: Opportunism in organizational partnerships may be understood in terms of how partners conclude that their self-interests are related to each other. When partners believe that their goals are competitively but not cooperatively related, they are tempted to pursue their self-interests opportunistically. Cognitive understandings and values of a shared vision may help partners believe their goals are cooperatively related. Results from 103 pairs of customer and supplier organizations support the argument that part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to social exchange theory, the development of affective commitment and personal relationships provides a mechanism other than dependency and switching costs to prolong the relationship between partners. Our findings are also consistent with recent research revealing that a shared vision can help partner organizations to believe that their goals are cooperatively related so that they do not feel threatened by opportunistic behavior (Wong, Tjosvold, & Yu, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to social exchange theory, the development of affective commitment and personal relationships provides a mechanism other than dependency and switching costs to prolong the relationship between partners. Our findings are also consistent with recent research revealing that a shared vision can help partner organizations to believe that their goals are cooperatively related so that they do not feel threatened by opportunistic behavior (Wong, Tjosvold, & Yu, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…First, many if not most studies rely on one-sided inquiry methods with single key informants (e.g., Carson et al 2006;Poppo et al 2008). In order to capture the dyadic nature of strategic alliances (Gulati 1998) and the different perspectives on trust and alliance performance, future research could implement two-sided measurement approaches including (2009) How managers can build trust in strategic alliances multiple respondents (e.g., Wong et al 2005). Those approaches bear the chance to shed light on both concurrent and incongruent perceptions of trust and performance.…”
Section: Implications For Future Research and Alliance Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, tactical impression management may be the appropriate strategy to subtly convince their interaction partners that the information they receive is indeed accurate and helpful. Thus, performance goal individuals may prevent detection of their own performance goal (''outperforming others'') by subtly masking their deceptive behavior (Wathne and Heide 2000;Wong et al 2005). Hence, the competence of exchange partners may guide the tactical deception considerations made by performance goal individuals to cover their deceptive behavior.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%