1986
DOI: 10.2307/2392787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
575
2
14

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,035 publications
(600 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
9
575
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of legitimacy can be disastrous for an organization. For instance, Fernandez (2008) found that Spanish associations considered more legitimate lasted longer, while Singh, Tucker and House (1986) concluded that external legitimacy depressed organizational death rates. These results are in line with institutional theory, which sustains that institutional rules act as myths which are incorporated by the organizations, gaining legitimacy, resources, stability, and enhanced survival prospects (Meyer & Rowan, 1977).…”
Section: Stakeholder Expectations Legitimacy and Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of legitimacy can be disastrous for an organization. For instance, Fernandez (2008) found that Spanish associations considered more legitimate lasted longer, while Singh, Tucker and House (1986) concluded that external legitimacy depressed organizational death rates. These results are in line with institutional theory, which sustains that institutional rules act as myths which are incorporated by the organizations, gaining legitimacy, resources, stability, and enhanced survival prospects (Meyer & Rowan, 1977).…”
Section: Stakeholder Expectations Legitimacy and Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown (1998, p. 35) states that "legitimate status is a sine qua non for easy access to resources, unrestricted access to markets, and long term survival". This assertion is supported by numerous investigations (Singh, Tucker, & House, 1986;Baum & Oliver, 1991, 1992Hannan & Carroll, 1992;Ruef & Scott, 1998).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…After evaluating the results, the following propositions were made: a) institutionalized organizations with greater cognitive legitimacy are not related to greater resources; b) organizations with greater cognitive legitimacy have better organizational results. A study of the literature showed a link between overall organizational legitimacy and improved results and/or access to resources (Singh, Tucker, & House, 1986;Baum & Oliver, 1991;Hannan & Carroll, 1992;Pollock & Rindova, 2003;Rossoni & Machado-Da-Silva, 2013) but this relationship had not been sufficiently explored concerning cognitive legitimacy. In fact, most studies use other types of legitimacy (see Ruef & Scott, 1998;Bansal & Clelland, 2004;Cohen and Dean, 2005;Higgins & Gulati, 2003.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociopolitical regulatory legitimacy involves complying with legal and professional standards and regulations. It has been operationalized in previous studies by measuring government agency support and policy establishment (Deephouse, 1996;Golant and Sillince, 2007;Singh et al, 1986). Sociopolitical normative legitimacy involves doing what is right by way of societal values and norms, procedures, and structures.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Organizational Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%