Learning, Working and Living 2005
DOI: 10.1057/9780230522350_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Learning and Workplace Learning — Similarities and Differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen, 2007;Tikkanen, 2002) of how new recruits, fresh from education continue their learning at work. Management studies frequently draw upon findings from WPL, this applies particularly within the areas of organisational learning (Elkjaer & Wahlgren, 2005).…”
Section: The Contributions Of Wplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jensen, 2007;Tikkanen, 2002) of how new recruits, fresh from education continue their learning at work. Management studies frequently draw upon findings from WPL, this applies particularly within the areas of organisational learning (Elkjaer & Wahlgren, 2005).…”
Section: The Contributions Of Wplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within these harmonizing paradigms, there is an implicit normativity where learning is equated with the companies' ability to survive (Elkjaer & Wahlgren 2006;Senge 1994). …”
Section: Learning and Learning Environments In Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflections on nursing practice raised questions about usual care processes and habits, a well‐known prerequisite for learning and change in action. Reflection is a semi‐conscious consideration of associations between actions and its consequences describing two levels of reflection: “how we will act” and “why we should act.” The question of why we should act has been termed “critical reflection” (Elkjaer & Wahlgren, ; Schön, ; Wahlgren, ). Critical reflection covers considerations of the purpose of actions and is supported when actions involve a conflict of values (Argyris & Schön, ; Berthelsen & Holge‐Hazelton, ; Elkjaer & Wahlgren, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%